2002
DOI: 10.1006/geno.2001.6675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Variability in Large-Scale Gene Expression Data: Implications for Study Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
158
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
158
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of noise across these biological studies agrees with the microarray studies where biological noise in cell cultures is less than that found in inbred mouse populations (32). It is easy to anticipate that biological variability in human population studies will be larger still.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The comparison of noise across these biological studies agrees with the microarray studies where biological noise in cell cultures is less than that found in inbred mouse populations (32). It is easy to anticipate that biological variability in human population studies will be larger still.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Probes for the microarray analysis were generated from isolated RNA obtained at days 1, 3, 5, and 8 of cocultures from three independent experiments. Affymetrix GeneChip Rat Genome 230 2.0 arrays were screened with the 12 generated probes via the microarray platform of McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Center (http://genomequebec.mcgill) exactly as described previously (35). To test for statistically significant changes in signal intensity (P values of Յ0.05), compiled data (robust multichip averaging analysis) were screened by using the software available on the microarray platform website.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data in the current study were obtained from at least three separate hybridizations per RNA sample and the genes were identified as expressed if at least two hybridizations provided a positive signal. For every probe, the signals obtained under two different conditions (i.e., A vs. B) were expressed as the difference (normalized signal in condition A Ϫ normalized signal in condition B) and considered to be significantly induced or repressed (folds) if this difference was outside a CI (P Ͻ .05) calculated 20 from the entire data set. To select the liver mRNAs that were regulated in patients with an acute inflammation versus controls, the value for any given mRNA from every individual with an inflammation was compared with the mean value obtained from the control set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%