2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of unbound and stabilized granular materials using field strains in low volume roads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these results, Hilbrich suggested the use of a seismic modulus test as a potential alternative to the resilient modulus test, given the lower cost and more repeatable results. Gonzalez et al, reported that resilient moduli obtained from laboratory tests were approximately three-times lower than the field modulus ( 24 ). When using these low laboratory-determined strains in a model that related the granular material vertical elastic strain and the number of load repetitions with the surface plastic deformation or rutting, the material performance was underestimated, which could lead to overdesign.…”
Section: Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these results, Hilbrich suggested the use of a seismic modulus test as a potential alternative to the resilient modulus test, given the lower cost and more repeatable results. Gonzalez et al, reported that resilient moduli obtained from laboratory tests were approximately three-times lower than the field modulus ( 24 ). When using these low laboratory-determined strains in a model that related the granular material vertical elastic strain and the number of load repetitions with the surface plastic deformation or rutting, the material performance was underestimated, which could lead to overdesign.…”
Section: Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several in situ nondestructive testing procedures for pavement are available. The main principle consists of applying a load of known value to the pavement and analyzing the direction and size of the induced deformation 10 . The most common deformation is in the vertical direction 11 – 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%