1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0518(19990115)37:2<159::aid-pola6>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene irradiated with ?-rays and electron beams to high doses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, due to the low penetration of electron beam, radicals at higher density by the electron beam disappeared much faster. Ikada et al [12] also observed this radical recombination in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene.…”
Section: Change Of Viscosity By Ionizing Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Also, due to the low penetration of electron beam, radicals at higher density by the electron beam disappeared much faster. Ikada et al [12] also observed this radical recombination in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene.…”
Section: Change Of Viscosity By Ionizing Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, it may play a role the synthesis of labile compounds if the rate constant of the process times the species concentration is high enough with respect to that of molecular oxygen. This step, which is reversible, is controlled by oxygen diffusion as shown by various works [35][36][37]. It means that oxygen molecular species from the gas phase go through each SA droplet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With e-beam irradiation, the dose rate is orders of magnitude higher than with gamma radiation (10 kGy/s with e-beam versus 1-10 kGy/h with gamma irradiation), and the irradiation time is on the order of seconds with e-beam, as opposed to hours with gamma irradiation. Comparing the two irradiation methods under the same conditions and the same dispensed doses, it has been observed that amount of oxidation was lower after e-beam irradiation than when gamma rays were used, due to the difference in dose rates and the ability of oxygen to diffuse into the UHMWPE during the longer irradiation times used with gamma irradiation [45].…”
Section: Distribution Of Oxidized Compounds In the New Uhmwpe Prosthementioning
confidence: 99%