2012
DOI: 10.1118/1.4764481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of tissue magnetic susceptibility‐induced distortions for MRIgRT

Abstract: The susceptibility distortions were quantified as a function of multiple parameters such as the χ inhomogeneity size and shape, the magnitude of B(0) and the readout gradient, and the orientation of B(0) with respect to the sample geometry. The analysis was performed for several anatomical sites and corresponding to two B(0) orientations as featured by MR-linac systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
127
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The susceptibly artefact in the 1.5 T MRI scanner is typically within 1 mm with an imaging gradient strength of 5 mT/m [20]. The estimated mean registration uncertainty was 1.3 mm.…”
Section: Conversion To Mri-only-based Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The susceptibly artefact in the 1.5 T MRI scanner is typically within 1 mm with an imaging gradient strength of 5 mT/m [20]. The estimated mean registration uncertainty was 1.3 mm.…”
Section: Conversion To Mri-only-based Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Magnetic susceptibility is a bulk property of a medium that describes the medium's capacity to become magnetized when placed in an applied magnetic field (58). A magnetic field influences the orbital angular momentum of electrons and the spins of electrons and nuclei.…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the median magnitude of the maximum systeminduced geometric distortion is 3.0 mm, while Stanescu et al(58) obtained median magnitudes of the maximum patient-dependent geometric distortion of 0.38 mm at 0.5 T and 2.42 mm at 3.0 T (Table 2). Linearly interpolating these values for patient-dependent distortion to 1.5 T, the field strength used in the prototype MR-guided linear accelerator (123), one obtains a median magnitude of the maximum patient-induced geometric distortion of 1.20 mm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…higher magnetic field suffers larger geometric distortion and increased gradient strength results in reduced geometric distortion. As shown by Stanescu et al, 30 the maximum distortion at nasal sinus air cavities is about 0.6 mm for a 0.5-T magnetic field with a gradient strength of 5 mTm 21 . 30 The VR MRI system has a smaller magnetic field (0.35 T) with a much higher gradient strength (18 mTm 21 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…As shown by Stanescu et al, 30 the maximum distortion at nasal sinus air cavities is about 0.6 mm for a 0.5-T magnetic field with a gradient strength of 5 mTm 21 . 30 The VR MRI system has a smaller magnetic field (0.35 T) with a much higher gradient strength (18 mTm 21 ). 25 It is reasonable to believe that the magnetic susceptibility-induced geometric distortion for the MRI system used in the study is not a major concern for contouring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%