2014
DOI: 10.1520/mpc20140037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Threshold Stress Intensity as a Function of Near-Tip Residual Stress: Theory, Experiment, and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A factor of about two was observed between the fatigue threshold and the elastic range observed numerically . This difference was attributed to a different mechanism of FCG near threshold linked to environmental damage …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A factor of about two was observed between the fatigue threshold and the elastic range observed numerically . This difference was attributed to a different mechanism of FCG near threshold linked to environmental damage …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 This difference was attributed to a different mechanism of FCG near threshold linked to environmental damage. 14 However, the assumption that the elastic range of ΔK does not contribute to FCG may not be consensual. There are also authors considering two driving forces for FCG: ΔK and K max .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An experimental procedure was developed to characterize intrinsic (closure free) component K th over a wide range of highly controlled and computable near-tip residual stress conditions. It was initially validated on 2024-T3 Al-alloy [18], then fine-tuned and demonstrated on a variety of materials [19] including additive manufactured materials [27].…”
Section: Intrinsic Threshold For Atmospheric Fatigue Crack Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Ref. 18, it is referred to as ΔK th , while we now refer to it as K th in order to differentiate it from the notation used in the literature that represents ΔK th as the sum of intrinsic and extrinsic components.]. The envelope of σ* variation under both constant amplitude as well as variable amplitude loading, including the partial cases that represent cyclic R-curve and compression-compression loading conditions are described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%