1989
DOI: 10.1002/pen.760291603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of thermal behavior and kinetics of crystallization of a thermotropic rigid‐chain copolymer

Abstract: Thermal analysis was employed to estimate the heat of transition, equilibrium melting temperature and surface free energy of a thermotropic liquid crystal copolyester resin (70 mol% p-hydroxybenzoic acid and 30 mol% 2,6-hydroxynaphthoic acid). Specific heats and melting and crystallization behavior were evaluated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Experiments over a wide range of cooling rates indicate two different crystallization processes: a rapid crystallization process and a slow crystallizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows DSC thermograms obtained during heating after the crystallization process, where an endothermic peak corresponding to the crystal–mesophase transition of Vectra can be observed with a maximum at 274 °C and an associated enthalpy of about 2.2 J g −1 , neither of which are significantly affected by the cooling rate. A similar behaviour has been found by Kamal et al 36 for a copolyester with small variations in the composition of HBA (70%) and HNA (30%) at high cooling rates. However, at lower cooling rates, they found an increase in the peak temperature and enthalpy of the endotherm on heating that they explained as a secondary slow crystallization process that occurred in the samples that were allowed to crystallize for longer times.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 4 shows DSC thermograms obtained during heating after the crystallization process, where an endothermic peak corresponding to the crystal–mesophase transition of Vectra can be observed with a maximum at 274 °C and an associated enthalpy of about 2.2 J g −1 , neither of which are significantly affected by the cooling rate. A similar behaviour has been found by Kamal et al 36 for a copolyester with small variations in the composition of HBA (70%) and HNA (30%) at high cooling rates. However, at lower cooling rates, they found an increase in the peak temperature and enthalpy of the endotherm on heating that they explained as a secondary slow crystallization process that occurred in the samples that were allowed to crystallize for longer times.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 9 shows the DSC thermograms of the blends obtained during heating at 10 °C min −1 after dynamic crystallization at 10 °C min −1 . The presence of a double endothermic peak of PEEK can be seen over the whole composition range and a broad endotherm of Vectra associated to the crystal‐nematic phase transition33, 36 is also observed, controlled by the cooling rate as previously noted. The thermal parameters obtained from the heating scans as a function of the cooling rate and composition are reported in Table 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[4,8,12,15] From the data reported in the literature and in this work, it is obvious that the fast crystallization process observed upon rapid cooling bears a close relationship to Wunderlich's "cold crystallization". [31] It corresponds to fast lateral crystallization in relatively ordered domains of the supercooled nematic melt and occurs by matching short identical sequences between adjacent chains.…”
Section: Nonisothermal Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In the latter case, we have calculated the area under the endotherm II by substracting the area under the four peaks (estimated to be 5.8 kJ N kg -1 ) from the total area. As observed for HBA/HNA copolymers [4,12,15] both the endotherms I and II are characterized by a linear growth of the magnitude of the heat of transition with the logarithm of the crystallization time (Figure 13). However, as observed for the temperature of transition, the increase in the heat of transition of the crystals formed via the process II is again more rapid than that of the crystals formed via the process I.…”
Section: Isothermal Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 83%