Abstract:For an economically feasible production of ethanol from plant biomass by microbial cells, the fermentation of xylose is important. As xylose uptake might be a limiting step for xylose fermentation by recombinant xyloseutilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells a study of xylose uptake was performed. After deletion of all of the 18 hexose-transporter genes, the ability of the cells to take up and to grow on xylose was lost. Reintroduction of individual hexose-transporter genes in this strain revealed that at inte… Show more
“…The most striking observation amongst the genes with a changed transcript level was the representation of various members of the hexose transport family, including HXT1, HXT2 and HXT4. Interestingly, HXT1 and HXT4 have been associated with d-xylose transport in previous studies [27,62]. To investigate whether the improved fermentation characteristics were indeed due to changes in sugar transport, zero trans-influx assays were performed using both the strain that was only metabolically engineered and the subsequently evolved strain [44].…”
Section: Evolutionary Engineering Of D-xylose-consuming S Cerevisiaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the inherent redox constraints of S. cerevisiae strains based on the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase strategy, this strategy has resulted in many important insights into the kinetics of d-xylose metabolism by engineered S. cerevisiae strains. These findings include the benefits of overexpression of xylulokinase [29,56], the side role of the S. cerevisiae aldose reductase (Gre3) (besides the heterologous dual specificity xylose reductases) in xylitol formation [66], the role of the enzymes of the non-oxidative part of the pentose phosphate pathway [34,43], characterisation of d-xylose transport [27,62] and many studies on the inhibitor tolerance/sensitivity of d-xylose-consuming strains [54]. The latter will be especially crucial for successful application of d-xylose-consuming S. cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates (see Sect.…”
Section: Introduction Of Heterologous Genes Encoding Xylose Reductasementioning
“…The most striking observation amongst the genes with a changed transcript level was the representation of various members of the hexose transport family, including HXT1, HXT2 and HXT4. Interestingly, HXT1 and HXT4 have been associated with d-xylose transport in previous studies [27,62]. To investigate whether the improved fermentation characteristics were indeed due to changes in sugar transport, zero trans-influx assays were performed using both the strain that was only metabolically engineered and the subsequently evolved strain [44].…”
Section: Evolutionary Engineering Of D-xylose-consuming S Cerevisiaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the inherent redox constraints of S. cerevisiae strains based on the xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase strategy, this strategy has resulted in many important insights into the kinetics of d-xylose metabolism by engineered S. cerevisiae strains. These findings include the benefits of overexpression of xylulokinase [29,56], the side role of the S. cerevisiae aldose reductase (Gre3) (besides the heterologous dual specificity xylose reductases) in xylitol formation [66], the role of the enzymes of the non-oxidative part of the pentose phosphate pathway [34,43], characterisation of d-xylose transport [27,62] and many studies on the inhibitor tolerance/sensitivity of d-xylose-consuming strains [54]. The latter will be especially crucial for successful application of d-xylose-consuming S. cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates (see Sect.…”
Section: Introduction Of Heterologous Genes Encoding Xylose Reductasementioning
“…However, inefficiencies due to a redox imbalance between NAD and NADP proton shuttles result in slow pentose metabolism (Bruinenberg et al, 1983). Furthermore, xylose is transported into recombinant S. cerevisiae cells by the same family of hexose transporters (Hxts) that are used for glucose uptake (Hamacher et al, 2002). Because these transporters have over a magnitude greater affinity for glucose than xylose, these recombinant yeast utilize xylose only after depletion of glucose in a pattern of diauxic growth (Kuyper et al, 2005).…”
Sequential uptake of pentose and hexose sugars that compose lignocellulosic biomass limits the ability of pure microbial cultures to efficiently produce value-added bioproducts. In this work, we used dynamic flux balance modeling to examine the capability of mixed cultures of substrate-selective microbes to improve the utilization of glucose/xylose mixtures and to convert these mixed substrates into products. Co-culture simulations of Escherichia coli strains ALS1008 and ZSC113, engineered for glucose and xylose only uptake respectively, indicated that improvements in batch substrate consumption observed in previous experimental studies resulted primarily from an increase in ZSC113 xylose uptake relative to wild-type E. coli. The E. coli strain ZSC113 engineered for the elimination of glucose uptake was computationally co-cultured with wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which can only metabolize glucose, to determine if the co-culture was capable of enhanced ethanol production compared to pure cultures of wild-type E. coli and the S. cerevisiae strain RWB218 engineered for combined glucose and xylose uptake. Under the simplifying assumption that both microbes grow optimally under common environmental conditions, optimization of the strain inoculum and the aerobic to anaerobic switching time produced an almost twofold increase in ethanol productivity over the pure cultures. To examine the effect of reduced strain growth rates at non-optimal pH and temperature values, a break even analysis was performed to determine possible reductions in individual strain substrate uptake rates that resulted in the same predicted ethanol productivity as the best pure culture.
“…Overexpression of the non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway enhanced xylulose but not xylose fermentation rate in recombinant S. cerevisiae (Johansson and HahnHägerdal, 2002), suggesting limitations prior to xylulose. The Hxt4p, Hxt5p, Hxt7p and Gal2p have been shown to transport xylose, but overexpression of the individual transporter-encoding genes did not enhance the specific growth rate on xylose in recombinant S. cerevisiae (Hamacher et al, 2002). It has also been shown that transport only limits xylose consumption rate at low xylose concentrations (Gardonyi et al, 2003).…”
Introduction of the xylose pathway from Pichia stipitis into Saccharomyces cerevisiae enables xylose utilization in recombinant S. cerevisiae. However, xylitol is a major by-product. An endogenous aldo-keto reductase, encoded by the GRE3 gene, was expressed at different levels in recombinant S. cerevisiae strains to investigate its effect on xylose utilization. In a recombinant S. cerevisiae strain producing only xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) from P. stipitis and an extra copy of the endogenous xylulokinase (XK), ethanol formation from xylose was mediated by Gre3p, capable of reducing xylose to xylitol. When the GRE3 gene was overexpressed in this strain, the xylose consumption and ethanol formation increased by 29% and 116%, respectively. When the GRE3 gene was deleted in the recombinant xylose-fermenting S. cerevisiae strain TMB3001 (which possesses xylose reductase and XDH from P. stipitis, and an extra copy of endogenous XK), the xylitol yield decreased by 49% and the ethanol yield increased by 19% in anaerobic continuous culture with a glucose/xylose mixture. Biomass was reduced by 31% in strains where GRE3 was deleted, suggesting that fine-tuning of GRE3 expression is the preferred choice rather than deletion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.