2016
DOI: 10.1002/xrs.2683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the VARIAN®PaxScan 2020+ flat panel detector for quantitative X‐ray imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Como sistema de detección, se utilizó un detector de estado sólido bidimensional flat panel con centelleador de ioduro de cesio (CsI) amorfo marca VARIAN Co. USA., modelo PaxScan 2020+, con un área de adquisición de 20 × 20 cm 2 , y resolución espacial correspondiente a un tamaño de pixel de 200 × 200 µm 2 [8].…”
Section: Montaje Experimentalunclassified
“…Como sistema de detección, se utilizó un detector de estado sólido bidimensional flat panel con centelleador de ioduro de cesio (CsI) amorfo marca VARIAN Co. USA., modelo PaxScan 2020+, con un área de adquisición de 20 × 20 cm 2 , y resolución espacial correspondiente a un tamaño de pixel de 200 × 200 µm 2 [8].…”
Section: Montaje Experimentalunclassified
“…Although the detector response function R(E) has been considered as uniform for practical purposes, it is worth remarking that any experimental detector, and particularly the Paxscan 2020 VARIAN digital flat panel, needs to be accurately characterized in terms of quantum efficiency P (E) and modulation transfer function. 24 More realistic approaches are obtained once the detector characteristics are introduced, which is necessary to compare the theoretical with experimental data. A further relevant issue, as mentioned for results summarized in Table 3, is that it should be kept in mind that values in -Table 4 may be interpreted in terms of the corresponding relative proportions.…”
Section: Analytic Estimation Of X-ray Absorption Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Both linear fitting method and quadratic function method demonstrate that with the increasing of delay time, the offset induced by leakage has not strictly proportional to the delay time, and also not strictly increasing according to the form of quadratic function; But the offset caused by leakage increases as the delay time increases. Table 2 pre-offset template is tested about the temperature error correction range, the ideal is to ensure the rapid imaging and at the same time, the 0.5s&5s pre-offset template can be obtained in advance and call the corresponding template according to the actual detector temperature so that the dynamic template can be adjusted to static [6] . A preliminary determination is made on whether the template could become invalid after long time.…”
Section: (A) (B) Figure IV 2sand10sand20s Pre-offset Template (A) 2s Delamentioning
confidence: 99%