2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(14)60048-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the topography and wettability of English weed leaves and biomimetic replicas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wettability can be described as a property governed by intermolecular interactions that characterizes the degree of wetting of a solid surface by a liquid droplet. One common way of characterizing wettability is through the measurement of the static CA θeq that results from the equilibrium between the interfacial tensions between solid, liquid, and vapor phases [11]. A surface is typically defined as water wetting for (approximately) θint<60° to 75° (measured through the aqueous phase), NAPL (non-aqueous phase liquid) wetting for θint>105° to 120°, and intermediate wetting for 75°<θint<105° [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wettability can be described as a property governed by intermolecular interactions that characterizes the degree of wetting of a solid surface by a liquid droplet. One common way of characterizing wettability is through the measurement of the static CA θeq that results from the equilibrium between the interfacial tensions between solid, liquid, and vapor phases [11]. A surface is typically defined as water wetting for (approximately) θint<60° to 75° (measured through the aqueous phase), NAPL (non-aqueous phase liquid) wetting for θint>105° to 120°, and intermediate wetting for 75°<θint<105° [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, David [20]. Moreover, the dynamic wetting such as transition energy barriers was studied through droplet interactions [21]. Even though the wetting properties on the irregularly micro-structured surface were theoretically simulated with regard to the relationship between surface fractal feather and heterogeneous nucleation [22], the simulated results were not further verified by corresponding experiments or actual applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface is considered to be smooth, with a mean roughness amplitude of the order of 0m±0.02m, as evaluated by a Dektak 3 profile meter (Veeco). A detailed description of the experimental procedure taken to characterize the wettability of the surfaces can be found in [14]. An infrared IR-high speed camera (MWIR-InSb from Xenics 179 -ONCA 4696 series) and a high-speed camera (Phantom v4.2) are placed bellow the heated surface and on the side, respectively, to capture simultaneous (but not synchronized) thermal and dynamics images of the impacting droplet.…”
Section: Experimental Arrangement and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%