2008
DOI: 10.1115/1.3005150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Performance of a Custom Program for Image Processing of Pressure Sensitive Film

Abstract: A custom program for the processing of pressure sensitive (Fuji) film data is presented and validated in this paper. Some of the shortcomings of previous descriptions of similar programs in literature are addressed. These shortcomings include incomplete descriptions of scan resolution, processing technique, and accuracy of results. Of these, the accuracy of results is the most important and is addressed in this study by using Fuji film calibration data. In Fuji film calibration, known loads are applied to form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scanned images were converted into contact congruency measures via a previously developed calibration program relating the image intensity to contact pressure. 30 All image processing and analyses were performed using custom MATLAB programs (Mathworks Inc).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scanned images were converted into contact congruency measures via a previously developed calibration program relating the image intensity to contact pressure. 30 All image processing and analyses were performed using custom MATLAB programs (Mathworks Inc).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of this study is that although we followed a filtering method that is validated against commercial packages, 46 defining the size of the averaging area remains subjective, thereby affecting the level of the estimated pressure values. A second limitation is that in order to reduce measurement error caused by the limited resolution of the pressure films, 49 the area of the end effector was scaled up about 8-10 times compared to laparoscopic end effectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature suggests a variety of filtering techniques, including matching positionally corresponding pixels of several stains obtained by the same object under the same pressure and calculating their mean to generate ‘average stain image’ data, 45 or replacing each pixel colour value with the average value of the pixels in a surrounded pixel area of certain size. 46 We followed the latter approach. To identify the size of the surrounded pixel area that would be the most appropriate for smoothening, stain images were generated for averaging areas ranging between 9 × 9 and 121 × 121 pixels, which, for a resolution of 1200 dpi, correspond to areas between 0.036 and 6.56 mm 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test fixture was composed of two parts: the first, a precision ground base onto which the film was placed and the second component was a precision ground cylindrical shaped indenter, which was placed in the hydraulic grips of a servo-hydraulic test frame tension/compression testing machine. The use of indenter-type calibration methods for pressure film is not new, and a variety of researchers 1517 have used variations on the indenter technique to produce calibration curves relating stain intensity and applied pressure. Slight variations in the uniformity of the stain were taken care of using image averaging techniques similar to those used by Liggins and Finlay.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%