2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.08.031419
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the nuclear and cytosolic transcriptomes in human brain tissue reveals new insights into the subcellular distribution of RNA transcripts

Abstract: Transcriptome analysis has mainly relied on analyzing RNA sequencing data from whole cells, overlooking the impact of subcellular RNA localization and its influence on our understanding of gene function, and interpretation of gene expression signatures in cells. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of cytosolic and nuclear transcriptomes in human fetal and adult brain samples. We show significant differences in RNA expression for proteincoding and lncRNA genes between cytosol and nucleus. Transcripts di… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cell composition (Figure 2B), we recovered the same main cell groups across compartments, as also reflected by the accuracy of a multiclass random forest classifier trained on scRNA-seq data in predicting cell types on snRNA-Seq data (Methods, Figure 2C-E) and vice versa (Figure S8F-H), and in overall similarity of cell type intrinsic (pseudobulk) profiles of protein coding genes (average Spearman ρ across cell types = 0.58 (skin), 0.69 (prostate), 0.53 (lung), Table S4). Notable divergences include the greater expression in cells vs. nuclei profiles of a stress/dissociation signature (Denisenko et al, 2020;van den Brink et al, 2017) (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 10 -16 , Figure 2F, Figure S10A,B), as we previously reported (Slyper et al, 2020), and of ribosomal and nuclear-encoded mitochondrial protein genes (Figure 2G, Methods, linear model), consistent with their longer half-lives and higher cytoplasmic levels (Rabani et al, 2014;Zaghlool et al, 2021).…”
Section: Snrna-seq Protocols Perform Well Across Tissues and Correspond To Scrna-seqsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…For cell composition (Figure 2B), we recovered the same main cell groups across compartments, as also reflected by the accuracy of a multiclass random forest classifier trained on scRNA-seq data in predicting cell types on snRNA-Seq data (Methods, Figure 2C-E) and vice versa (Figure S8F-H), and in overall similarity of cell type intrinsic (pseudobulk) profiles of protein coding genes (average Spearman ρ across cell types = 0.58 (skin), 0.69 (prostate), 0.53 (lung), Table S4). Notable divergences include the greater expression in cells vs. nuclei profiles of a stress/dissociation signature (Denisenko et al, 2020;van den Brink et al, 2017) (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 10 -16 , Figure 2F, Figure S10A,B), as we previously reported (Slyper et al, 2020), and of ribosomal and nuclear-encoded mitochondrial protein genes (Figure 2G, Methods, linear model), consistent with their longer half-lives and higher cytoplasmic levels (Rabani et al, 2014;Zaghlool et al, 2021).…”
Section: Snrna-seq Protocols Perform Well Across Tissues and Correspond To Scrna-seqsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…To first assay the efficiency with which Halo-seq can enrich localized RNAs in C2bbe1 monolayers, we targeted the cytoplasmic compartment for analysis with Halo-seq. Because differences between the cytoplasmic and nuclear transcriptomes are well characterized (Engel et al, 2021; Zaghlool et al, 2021), we reasoned that this would provide a good benchmark of the technique in C2bbe1 monolayers. We fused a HaloTag domain to a cytoplasmically restricted NF-kappa B subunit, P65.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6b,d). These results show high overlap with studies in other tissues that identi ed differential enrichment of mRNA molecules in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments [35][36][37]. For instance, it was demonstrated in Zaghlool, Niazi [37] that many nuclearencoded-mitochondrial protein (NEMPs) mRNAs are signi cantly enriched in the cytosolic compartment across various human tissue types.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…These results show high overlap with studies in other tissues that identi ed differential enrichment of mRNA molecules in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments [35][36][37]. For instance, it was demonstrated in Zaghlool, Niazi [37] that many nuclearencoded-mitochondrial protein (NEMPs) mRNAs are signi cantly enriched in the cytosolic compartment across various human tissue types. To determine if NEMPs mRNAs were also preferentially localized in the ATAC-SN fraction of human T cells, we retrieved a full list of genes (n = 1158) encoding proteins associated with mitochondrial localization from Mitocharta2.0 [38] and conducted gene enrichment analysis for differentially expressed genes either up-or down-regulated in the ATAC-SN fraction and human NEMPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%