The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1214/16-ejp4607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the law for 3D stochastic hyperviscous fluids

Abstract: We consider the 3D hyperviscous Navier-Stokes equations in vorticity form, where the dissipative term −∆ ξ of the Navier-Stokes equations is substituted by (−∆) 1+c ξ. We investigate how big the correction term c has to be in order to prove, by means of Girsanov transform, that the vorticity equations are equivalent (in law) to easier reference equations obtained by neglecting the stretching term. This holds as soon as c > 1 2 , improving previous results obtained with c > 3 2 in a different setting in [5,14].… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our global well-posedness results are applicable for the case θ 2 = 1, θ 1 = 1 4 and the case θ 1 = 0, θ 2 ≥ 5 4 , which are corresponding to the the stochastic critical Leray-α model (see [2] for deterministic case) and hyperviscous Navier-Stokes equations. Hence our results cover and generalize some corresponding results in [2,19,22,24,27,44]. And we believe that the methods presented in this paper are also useful for tackling other types of SPDEs with fractional Laplacian.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, our global well-posedness results are applicable for the case θ 2 = 1, θ 1 = 1 4 and the case θ 1 = 0, θ 2 ≥ 5 4 , which are corresponding to the the stochastic critical Leray-α model (see [2] for deterministic case) and hyperviscous Navier-Stokes equations. Hence our results cover and generalize some corresponding results in [2,19,22,24,27,44]. And we believe that the methods presented in this paper are also useful for tackling other types of SPDEs with fractional Laplacian.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the case of θ 1 = 0, the stochastic fractional (or hyperviscous) Navier-Stokes equations have been intensively studied (see e.g. [19,24,44,46,50] and references within). Chueshov and Millet in [16] proved the well-posedness and large deviation principle of stochastic 3D Leray-α model in the case of θ 1 = θ 2 = 1 (see also [22]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How could one prove uniqueness in law by means of probabilistic arguments? Girsanov theorem is the easiest method but it cannot work for Navier-Stokes equations, as Ferrario has shown in [33]. In general it seems that the Girsanov approach has limitations that are too strong.…”
Section: Role Of Kolmogorov Equation For Uniqueness In Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When θ 1 = 0, the stochastic fractional (or hyperviscous) Navier-Stokes equations have been intensively studied (see e.g. [20,26,38,48,54] and references within). The authors in [19] proved the well-posedness and large deviation principle of stochastic 3D Leray-α model in the case of θ 1 = θ 2 = 1 (see also [22]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%