2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18383-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the interactions between inhibitor-1 and recombinant PP1 by NMR spectroscopy

Abstract: Inhibitor-1 is converted into a potent inhibitor of native protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) when Thr35 is phosphorylated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). However, PKA-phosphorylated form of inhibitor-1 displayed a weak activity in inhibition of recombinant PP1. The mechanism for the impaired activity of PKA-phosphorylated inhibitor-1 toward inhibition of recombinant PP1 remained elusive. By using NMR spectroscopy in combination with site-directed mutagenesis and inhibitory assay, we found that the interactio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear if all PP1 holoenzymes are equally and proportionally inhibited by I-1*, or if the partial inhibition primarily affects a subset of holoenzymes. I-1-PP1 interaction involves the RVXF binding domain and is predicted to involve the PP1 acidic groove (Liang et al, 2018; Terrak et al, 2004). I-1* may therefore have higher binding affinity to PP1 holoenzymes in which the acidic groove is fully exposed, such as neurabin-PP1 (Ragusa et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear if all PP1 holoenzymes are equally and proportionally inhibited by I-1*, or if the partial inhibition primarily affects a subset of holoenzymes. I-1-PP1 interaction involves the RVXF binding domain and is predicted to involve the PP1 acidic groove (Liang et al, 2018; Terrak et al, 2004). I-1* may therefore have higher binding affinity to PP1 holoenzymes in which the acidic groove is fully exposed, such as neurabin-PP1 (Ragusa et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%