2004
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0501:cotiff>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Immersion Factor for a Series of In-Water Optical Radiometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results from the difference between the refractive indices for air and water at the collector interface (16). In order to correct for this, an IL1400 radiometer (International Light, Newburyport, MA) using a UVB filter (UVB-1; International Light) was calibrated for underwater use against a scanning spectroradiometer using a similar methodology as specified by Zibordi (17), Hooker & Zibordi (18) and Zibordi et al (19). It was estimated that a variation of less than 1% would exist between the immersion factors calculated over the range of temperatures recorded during each experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results from the difference between the refractive indices for air and water at the collector interface (16). In order to correct for this, an IL1400 radiometer (International Light, Newburyport, MA) using a UVB filter (UVB-1; International Light) was calibrated for underwater use against a scanning spectroradiometer using a similar methodology as specified by Zibordi (17), Hooker & Zibordi (18) and Zibordi et al (19). It was estimated that a variation of less than 1% would exist between the immersion factors calculated over the range of temperatures recorded during each experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the discrepancies between the refractive indices for air and water at the collector interface. The methodology employed to calculate immersion factors for optical instrumentation has been detailed in previous studies [24,25,26] with the actual immersion factors for the EPP2000 spectrometer provided in [22].…”
Section: Ppo Dosimeter Calibration and Immersion Effect Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the discrepancies between the refractive indices for air and water at the collector interface. The methodology employed to calculate these immersion factors was based upon the work of Zibordi [23], Hooker & Zibordi [24] and Zibordi et al [25].…”
Section: Immersion Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%