2020
DOI: 10.1002/jor.24854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the human intervertebral disc cartilage endplate at the molecular, cell, and tissue levels

Abstract: Given the importance of the cartilage endplate (CEP) in low back pain (LBP), there is a need to characterize the human CEP at the molecular, cell, and tissue levels to inform treatment strategies that target it. The goal of this study was to characterize the structure, matrix composition, and cell phenotype of the human CEP compared with adjacent tissues within the intervertebral joint: the nucleus pulposus (NP), annulus fibrosus (AF), and articular cartilage (AC). Isolated CEP, NP, AF, and AC tissues and cell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To characterize and compare the CEP cell phenotype further, bovine and canine CEP, NP, AF, and AC cells were evaluated for IVD joint matrix and IVD/AC cell marker gene expression (Figure 5). In addition, these comparisons would also ensure there was no cross‐contamination during dissection and isolation, validating our previous method of CEP isolation for human cells 20,21 . There was significantly higher COL1, COL2, and ACAN, and COL1 and COL2 expression in the bovine AF and AC compared to the CEP, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To characterize and compare the CEP cell phenotype further, bovine and canine CEP, NP, AF, and AC cells were evaluated for IVD joint matrix and IVD/AC cell marker gene expression (Figure 5). In addition, these comparisons would also ensure there was no cross‐contamination during dissection and isolation, validating our previous method of CEP isolation for human cells 20,21 . There was significantly higher COL1, COL2, and ACAN, and COL1 and COL2 expression in the bovine AF and AC compared to the CEP, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We have previously evaluated expression of T, KRT19, MKX, and FBLN1 in human CEP cells and found human CEP cells express T and KRT19, MKX, or FBLN1 at equal or greater levels than human NP, AF, or AC, respectively. Furthermore, we previously demonstrated significantly higher COLX expression in the human CEP compared to NP on the protein level 20,21 . There was lower expression of T, FBLN1, and COLX in bovine CEP cells and lower expression of KRT19, MKX, FBLN1, and COLX in canine CEP cells compared to human CEP cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Extreme care taken when separating CEP, AF and NP tissue during dissection, and previously observed differences in marker expression at the gene level between cells using the same isolation technique, suggest isolation of distinct cell populations 36,37 . Nevertheless, crosscontamination with additional cell types, such as inflammatory cells, could still be a minimal concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Addition of an articular chondrocyte control to directly compare CEP and articular chondrocyte cell behavior in vitro and increasing sample size in order to further validate the effect of culture conditions and oxygen tension on sex and age‐related differences in human CEP samples would enhance the rigor of the current study. Extreme care taken when separating CEP, AF, and NP tissue during dissection, and previously observed differences in marker expression at the gene level between cells using the same isolation technique, suggest isolation of distinct cell populations 36,43 . Nevertheless, cross contamination with additional cell types, such as inflammatory cells, could still be a minimal concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%