2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02754-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the fecal microbiota in gastrointestinal cancer patients and healthy people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those results involved a five‐fold cross‐validation for data preparation of a random forest mode in a single study gathering 73 participants with 76% of patients diagnosed at more advanced stages of the disease. Additionally, two models including fecal microbiota achieved AUC values of 0.97 and 0.94, the latter involving cross‐validation for data preparation 23,34 . None of the remaining biomarkers included in Table 2 were validated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Those results involved a five‐fold cross‐validation for data preparation of a random forest mode in a single study gathering 73 participants with 76% of patients diagnosed at more advanced stages of the disease. Additionally, two models including fecal microbiota achieved AUC values of 0.97 and 0.94, the latter involving cross‐validation for data preparation 23,34 . None of the remaining biomarkers included in Table 2 were validated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the included reports in stool samples were performed in Asian populations, seven in China 23 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 and one in Iran, 36 and were case‐control studies. Overall, four biomarkers were explored: (a) fecal calprotectin in two studies 33 , 36 ; (b) B‐cell activating factor (BAFF) protein in one study 33 ; (c) telomerase reverse transcriptase ( TERT ) gene promoter methylation in one population 30 and (d) the fecal microbiota was explored in five Chinese populations, 23 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 35 either targeting bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and fungal 18S rRNA or bacterial DNA. Stool‐based biomarkers with reported expression in GC, as well as AUC values, are summarized in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Klebsiella oxytocin colonization in mice led to a similar outcome with increased anxiety-like phenotype following increased inflammation through NF-kB-dependent pathways ( 28 ). Faecalibacterium is widely thought to defend against gastrointestinal and extraintestinal diseases ( 29 ), and also appears to be beneficial to overall health, minimizing the occurrence of metabolic disorders as well as a variety of chronic diseases and inflammatory pathologies ( 30 ). Our study showed that the abundance of Faecalibacterium was reduced in AUD patients, indicating that alcohol consumption can destroy beneficial bacteria in the gut, rendering the microbiota detrimental to the human body and weakening their protective functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, it was observed that A. muciniphila abundance was heavily increased in two different cohorts of patients affected by CRC, as well as in a cohort of patients with esophageal and gastric cancers compared with healthy controls [77,78]. However, according to Weil et al, this observation can be related to an increased substrate availability rather than to a detrimental role of this bacterium, considering the overexpression of MUC1 and MUC5AC in CRCs [78].…”
Section: Akkermansia Muciniphila and Cancermentioning
confidence: 95%