SAE Technical Paper Series 2006
DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-2443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Effect of Material Configuration and Impact Parameters on Damage Tolerance of Sandwich Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical design of experiment techniques may be used to identify and model complex relationships between input design factors and output responses in material systems. With polymer composites, these statistical techniques have previously been used for dynamic mechanical analysis, Izod impact testing of VGCNF/VE nanocomposites, and damage characterization of sandwich composites by isolating and examining the effects of multiple input design factors. The relationships between these factors can be statistically explored by developing response surface models (RSMs) to determine the estimated responses within the design boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical design of experiment techniques may be used to identify and model complex relationships between input design factors and output responses in material systems. With polymer composites, these statistical techniques have previously been used for dynamic mechanical analysis, Izod impact testing of VGCNF/VE nanocomposites, and damage characterization of sandwich composites by isolating and examining the effects of multiple input design factors. The relationships between these factors can be statistically explored by developing response surface models (RSMs) to determine the estimated responses within the design boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A response surface methodology22 was employed in a central composite design (CCD)23, 24 in order to isolate and examine the effects of multiple factors (i.e., VGCNF weight fraction, high‐shear mixing time, and ultrasonication time) on nanocomposite impact strengths using the minimum number of runs. In the context of polymer composites, such powerful statistical techniques have previously been used for dynamic mechanical analysis of VGCNF/VE nanocomposites,10 damage characterization of sandwich composites,25–28 epoxy nanocomposites,29 thermoplastic starch/clay nanocomposites,30 polyurethane/clay nanocomposites,31 polystyrene/montmorillonite nanocomposites,32 and so forth. High‐shear mixing and ultrasonication were chosen as the mixing techniques due to their prevalent use in previous studies 10, 12, 15–17.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These five configurations represent a subset of a 20-configuration, three-factor central composite face-centered (CCF) circumscribed design of experiments test matrix that spans the limits of each of the three independent variables. Similarly to the Box-Behnken design [44], the CCF design fits a statistical response surface through a sphere that is circumscribed within a cube representing the design domain http://carbonlett.org post-tested specimens. The quasi-static uniaxial compressive response of each material configuration was characterized at an applied engineering strain rate of 10 -3 s -1 in order to ensure an isothermal state of pure mechanical loading with no influences from temperature effects that manifest themselves at higher loading rates through the conversion of a percentage of the plastic work into internal heat generation within the sample.…”
Section: Experimental Design Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the length scale of the nano-reinforcements of interest [48]. A typical sample of each material configuration was broken into manually to expose a fracture surface for cross-sectional imaging.…”
Section: Sem Imaging and Quantitative Characterization Of The Bulk Namentioning
confidence: 99%