2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11012-005-7965-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Dynamic Response of Structures to Damaging Pulse-type Near-fault Ground Motions

Abstract: Abstract. The presence of long-period pulses in near-fault records can be considered as an important factor in causing damage due to the transmission of large amounts of energy to the structures in a very short time. Under such circumstances high-energy dissipation demands usually occur, which are likely to concentrate in the weakest parts of the structure. The maximum nonlinear response or collapse often happens at the onset of directivity pulse and fling, and this time is not predicted by the natural structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this framework, it is worth highlighting that existing equivalent linear models for bilinear oscillators were developed without considering explicitly pulse-like near-fault ground motions, which seismological characteristics are different from the properties typically observed in case of far-field seismic events. In fact, several strong motion records obtained in recent earthquakes at sites close to the seismic causative fault exhibited a noticeable variability in the damage potential [8][9][10]. The reasons of this variability are the proximity of the source and the occurrence of forward directivity effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this framework, it is worth highlighting that existing equivalent linear models for bilinear oscillators were developed without considering explicitly pulse-like near-fault ground motions, which seismological characteristics are different from the properties typically observed in case of far-field seismic events. In fact, several strong motion records obtained in recent earthquakes at sites close to the seismic causative fault exhibited a noticeable variability in the damage potential [8][9][10]. The reasons of this variability are the proximity of the source and the occurrence of forward directivity effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinguished characteristics of near-fault records to those of far-fault can be clearly described based on observation in Figure 2 [42] large long period velocity pulse. It may range from 2s to 5s [43][44][45] which is similar to the fundamental natural period range of 15 to 50 storey buildings [44]. This characteristic can be also recognized in Figure In near-fault regions, the characteristics of earthquake records depend on the faulting mechanism, rupture propagation and the possible static deformation (fling-step effects) [40,48].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Near-fault Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…These models will later be used in subsequent chapters to compare with the new damage model for concrete. The third part of this chapter presents the distinct characteristics of near-fault motions in comparison to far-fault ones: pulse-type, long pulse-type period [43][44][45], high energy at the onset of records [51,52], high peak ground acceleration [55], intense velocity [45,55,56], and large displacements (fling-step) [57,58]. This is followed by a number of models of near-fault ground motions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations