2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.08.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the DNA‐binding site in the ferric uptake regulator protein from Escherichia coli by UV crosslinking and mass spectrometry

Abstract: Ferric uptake regulator protein (Fur) is activated by its cofactor iron to a state that binds to a specific DNA sequence called ÔFur boxÕ. Using mass spectrometry-based methods, we showed that Tyr 55 of Escherichia coli Fur, as well as the two thymines in positions 18 and 19 of the consensus Fur Box, are involved with binding. A conformational model of the Fur-DNA complex is proposed, in which DNA is in contact with each H4 [A52-A64] Fur helix. We propose that this interaction is a common feature for the Fur-l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4D). The residues that showed larger decreases in LonA binding on both the alanine and aspartate substitution blots were all located on helix 4 of PerR, a region highly conserved among PerR homologs (see Fur, a Paralog of PerR in B. subtilis, Is Not a LonA Substrate) and known to be involved in DNA binding (11,12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4D). The residues that showed larger decreases in LonA binding on both the alanine and aspartate substitution blots were all located on helix 4 of PerR, a region highly conserved among PerR homologs (see Fur, a Paralog of PerR in B. subtilis, Is Not a LonA Substrate) and known to be involved in DNA binding (11,12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VOL. 192, 2010 GONOCOCCAL Fur REGULON 81 (50) attribute the binding to the putative Fur DNA helix recognition region. The intragenic FB sequence logo, in contrast to the promoter-proximal FB sequence logo, showed a reduced frequency of thymidine residues able to bind Fur (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optional C-terminal tail has been associated with metal binding, folding (Pohl et al, 2003) are shown. BS, potential binding site residues for iron; Y56, tyrosine 56 which is in direct contact with DNA target (Tiss et al, 2005); C92-C95 and C132-C135, cysteine residues involved in disulfide bridge formation in E. coli (D'Autréaux et al, 2007). At each position an asterisk indicates identical residues, a colon denotes conserved substitutions, and a dot represents semi-conserved substitutions.…”
Section: Basic Properties Of Fur From Members Of the Vibrionaceae Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear to us if the strandspecific contribution of T13 is due to real differences in interactions between the DNA and the Fur homodimer, or if it is due to an artifact in the MD simulations and binding free energy calculations. Using a mass spectrometry-based method, EC-Fur and the E. coli "classical" Fur box, Tiss and coworkers (Tiss et al, 2005) showed that T12 and T13 (correspond to T15 and T16 in E. coli) directly interact with the protein. In summary, A14 and C16, which are conserved in B. subtilis and Y. pestis, represent new potential interaction sites between Fur and DNA.…”
Section: Vibrio-specific Fur Box Residues Involved In Interaction Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation