2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the discriminable stimulus produced by 2‐BFI: effects of imidazoline I2‐site ligands, MAOIs, β‐carbolines, agmatine and ibogaine

Abstract: 1 The molecular nature and functions of the I 2 subtype of imidazoline binding sites are unknown but evidence suggests an association with monoamine oxidase (MAO). Rats can distinguish the selective imidazoline I 2 -site ligand 2-BFI from vehicle in drug discrimination, indicating functional consequences of occupation of these sites. We have used drug discrimination to investigate the nature of the discriminable stimulus, especially in relation to MAO inhibition. 2 Following training to distinguish 2-BFI 7 mg … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro, many imidazolines, including 2-BFI and BU224, reversibly inhibit MAO-A with a similar potency to that of the reversible MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide (IC 50 : 2-BFI, 16.572.7 mM; BU224, 4.870.2 mM; moclobemide, 3673.6 mM; Lalies et al, 1999). These imidazolines also similarly inhibit MAO-B, although with less potency than the selective reversible MAO-B inhibitor, lazabemide (IC 50 : 2-BFI, 27.972.2 mM; BU224, 44.876.6 mM (Lalies et al, 1999); lazabemide, 0.03 mM (Da Prada et al, 1987)) and in vivo studies indicate that moclobemide, lazabemide and deprenyl show substitution for 2-BFI in an two-lever drug-discrimination paradigm (MacInnes & Handley, 2002). However, there appears to be little correlation between these agents' affinity for I 2 sites and their inhibition of MAO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In vitro, many imidazolines, including 2-BFI and BU224, reversibly inhibit MAO-A with a similar potency to that of the reversible MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide (IC 50 : 2-BFI, 16.572.7 mM; BU224, 4.870.2 mM; moclobemide, 3673.6 mM; Lalies et al, 1999). These imidazolines also similarly inhibit MAO-B, although with less potency than the selective reversible MAO-B inhibitor, lazabemide (IC 50 : 2-BFI, 27.972.2 mM; BU224, 44.876.6 mM (Lalies et al, 1999); lazabemide, 0.03 mM (Da Prada et al, 1987)) and in vivo studies indicate that moclobemide, lazabemide and deprenyl show substitution for 2-BFI in an two-lever drug-discrimination paradigm (MacInnes & Handley, 2002). However, there appears to be little correlation between these agents' affinity for I 2 sites and their inhibition of MAO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our previous studies (MacInnes & Handley, 2002), single-drug experiments were conducted every other day, while L-DOPA combination studies were conducted on Mondays and Thursdays. Different doses, including vehicle control, were distributed across sessions and rats in pseudorandom order except for deprenyl, which, because it is an irreversible inhibitor, was given as the last dose to group 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, agmatine, BU224 and clonidine had also been reported to attenuate many behavioural characteristics of morphine abstinence syndrome [115]. In drug-discrimination models, harmane along with selective I 2 -BS compounds were shown to potently and dose-dependently substitute for 2-BFI in the twolever operant chamber model [116]. Moreover, harmane was also reported to substitute BU224 in drug discrimination studies [117].…”
Section: Harmane -The Endogenous Ligand At Imidazoline Binding Sites?mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, both 2-BFI and BU224 increase rotational behaviors in rats with nigrostriatal lesions (MacInnes and Duty, 2004). In drug discrimination studies, both idazoxan and BU224 produce responding predominantly on the 2-BFI-associated lever in rats (Jordan et al, 1996; MacInnes and Handley, 2002). Thus, idazoxan and BU224 appear to be agonists in some assays and antagonists in other assays, suggesting that these drugs have lower efficacy at I 2 receptors as compared to other ligands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%