2013
DOI: 10.1118/1.4792297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the count rate performance of modern gamma cameras

Abstract: Purpose: Evaluation of count rate performance (CRP) is an integral component of gamma camera quality assurance and system deadtime (τ ) may be utilized for image correction in quantitative studies. This work characterizes the CRP of three modern gamma cameras and estimates τ using two established methods (decay and dual source) under a variety of experimental conditions. Methods: For the decay method, uncollimated detectors were exposed to a Tc-99m source of relatively high activity and count rates were sample… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data clearly shows that the paralysable model based on wide-spectrum acquisition count rate is nevertheless able to accurately estimate lost primary photon counts regardless of the cause, up to the maximum usable wide-spectrum count rate (~350 kcps) of the system. As observed by others, the actual maximum count rate was lower than the theoretical one (1/e • 0.550 μs = 669 kcps for our system), which emphasizes the need to experimentally measure it to fully characterize the system [16]. Beyond that point quantification is not possible and, with our SPECT/CT system, the image is distorted because of the divergent detector behaviour (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data clearly shows that the paralysable model based on wide-spectrum acquisition count rate is nevertheless able to accurately estimate lost primary photon counts regardless of the cause, up to the maximum usable wide-spectrum count rate (~350 kcps) of the system. As observed by others, the actual maximum count rate was lower than the theoretical one (1/e • 0.550 μs = 669 kcps for our system), which emphasizes the need to experimentally measure it to fully characterize the system [16]. Beyond that point quantification is not possible and, with our SPECT/CT system, the image is distorted because of the divergent detector behaviour (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Several methods have been proposed to evaluate these parameters, some more demanding than others in terms of acquisition time, decay period, and image processing [8,9,[16][17][18][19][20][21]. Planar imaging-based calibration is faster and more convenient to execute and is expected to yield accurate CF [9,20] relative to fully tomographic calibration as the reference method [9,21,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, however, correction for deadtime count loss is needed, the recently proposed revised monitor source method for practical deadtime count loss compensation can be employed. 29,30…”
Section: F Correction For Deadtime Count Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Acrylic slabs of various thicknesses (2, 5, 9, 12, and 16 cm) were placed right below the phantom to introduce attenuation and scatter. For the 5 cmthick acrylic slab, the distance between the collimator and the phantom was varied to 15,20,25,30, and 35 cm. Planar static images were acquired for each imaging condition.…”
Section: B Choosing Appropriate Imaging Energy Windowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results, camera sensitivity variations were small and had little effect on the variance of the calibration factor. The extrinsic flood source count rate was corrected for dead time using a paralyzable model, while current SPECT cameras are neither purely paralyzable nor non-paralyzable [16]. It is possible that errors due to this correction masked the usefulness of the sensitivity factor to explain variations in the calibration factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%