2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0017816014000157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Chemical Nature of the Black Ink in the Manuscript of The Gospel of Jesus's Wife through Micro-Raman Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the list was increased by: an illuminated Manueline foral charter (LeGac et), a 16th century printed Book ‘Osorio’ with colourful fore‐edge Miniatures (Lukačević, et al), the Manueline foral charter of Sintra (Manso et al), a rare Old Slavic manuscript (Kostadinovska et al), a royal 15th century illuminated parchment (Duran et al), a 15th century manuscript (Zoleo et al), the Manuscript of The Gospel of Jesus's Wife (Yardley and Hagadorn) and the pre‐Hispanic Maya ‘Madrid Codex’ (Buti et al).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the list was increased by: an illuminated Manueline foral charter (LeGac et), a 16th century printed Book ‘Osorio’ with colourful fore‐edge Miniatures (Lukačević, et al), the Manueline foral charter of Sintra (Manso et al), a rare Old Slavic manuscript (Kostadinovska et al), a royal 15th century illuminated parchment (Duran et al), a 15th century manuscript (Zoleo et al), the Manuscript of The Gospel of Jesus's Wife (Yardley and Hagadorn) and the pre‐Hispanic Maya ‘Madrid Codex’ (Buti et al).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of this debate, Krutzsch and Rabin discussed several methods for characterizing ancient writing materials as applied to GJW. With respect to our preliminary description of the raw Raman spectra for the pigments in GJW, they raised some technical questions that we quantitatively clarify here. However, they also questioned the scientific value of characterization of GJW through Raman spectroscopy, concluding that the results are ‘not sufficient to support authenticity of [GJW]’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They asserted that the GJW was forged by association with the fragment of John, since the two papyri shared ‘exactly the same hand, exactly the same ink and … [were] written with the same writing instrument’ (Askeland 2014a). Somewhat ironically, these scholars came to this conclusion in part by reading the full initial report of our work, which had been posted online and contained detailed images of the papyri (Yardley and Hagadorn 2013). The irony lies in the fact that we asserted at that time, and still maintain, that the ‘ink or inks used in GJW are similar to, but distinct from, the ink used for the Gospel of John manuscript’ (Yardley and Hagadorn 2014: 164).…”
Section: The Gospel Of Jesus’ Wife and The Gospel Of Johnmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Subsequently, in February 2016 team members went to Boston to take small ink samples, in order to examine the morphology of the pigment particles with a scanning electron microscope. Our initial work on these controversial papyri was published as an appendix to Karen King’s first article in the Harvard Theological Review (Yardley and Hagadorn 2014). Between the publication of that article and the summer of 2016, the authenticity of the GJW was debated vigorously, both in the traditional academic press and online, with the general consensus shifting decidedly over that period against the fragment’s antiquity, in no small part because the Gospel of John fragment was shown to have been copied from Herbert Thompson’s 1924 edition of the Cambridge Qus codex.…”
Section: The Gospel Of Jesus’ Wife and The Gospel Of Johnmentioning
confidence: 99%