2001
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m104807200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Binding Interface between the Copper Chaperone Atx1 and the First Cytosolic Domain of Ccc2 ATPase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
166
2
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
14
166
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Characteristic residues discussed in the text and highlighted in Fig. 1 are shown in brown space-filling representation and are labeled site would be in favorable position to capture copper from copper-loaded chaperones, which presumably donate copper to the ATPase (Arnesano et al 2001(Arnesano et al , 2004.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristic residues discussed in the text and highlighted in Fig. 1 are shown in brown space-filling representation and are labeled site would be in favorable position to capture copper from copper-loaded chaperones, which presumably donate copper to the ATPase (Arnesano et al 2001(Arnesano et al , 2004.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this frame, we may speculate that the water molecule interacting with the solvent accessible Cu(II) ion in site A can be displaced by Met residues, either from CopA, CopB or from site B of a second CopC molecule in a head-tail interaction, but that only copper reduction triggers metal transfer to the new Met-rich site, having higher affinity for Cu(I). If the two sites with different affinity for the two redox states of copper are nearby, the mechanism of copper release and uptake occurs in a protective local environment, reminiscent of that of metallochaperones (52,53), ensuring a safer metal transfer in the periplasmic space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this finding may be because of the presence of a glutathione S-transferase tag (33), it could also result from the two domains coordinating a single Cu(I) ion. Because the binding surface of the target domain is proposed to involve regions near the CXXC motif (15,37), coordination of a single Cu(I) ion between the CXXC motifs in MNK domains 1 and 2 could hinder Atox1 access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consideration of the electrostatic properties of each domain furnishes part of the answer. Interactions between Atox1 or Atx1 and their target domains involve complementary electrostatic surfaces (15,16,37,48). In particular, positively charged residues on the chaperone surface interact with negatively charged residues on the target domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%