2011
DOI: 10.1021/ma201148f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Surface Viscoelasticity and Energy Dissipation in a Polymer Film by Atomic Force Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the evolution of the atomic force microscope (AFM) is being shaped by the need to provide a full and non-invasive characterization of complex interfaces such as solid-liquid interfaces [1][2][3][4] , heterogeneous polymer interfaces [5][6][7] , energy-storage devices 8 , cells [9][10] or protein membranes [11][12][13][14] . Ideally, those methods should complement the high spatial resolution of AFM with the following properties: (1) material characterization independent of the probe properties; (2) quantitative; (3) minimal tip and sample preparation; and (4) compatible with high-speed data acquisition and imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the evolution of the atomic force microscope (AFM) is being shaped by the need to provide a full and non-invasive characterization of complex interfaces such as solid-liquid interfaces [1][2][3][4] , heterogeneous polymer interfaces [5][6][7] , energy-storage devices 8 , cells [9][10] or protein membranes [11][12][13][14] . Ideally, those methods should complement the high spatial resolution of AFM with the following properties: (1) material characterization independent of the probe properties; (2) quantitative; (3) minimal tip and sample preparation; and (4) compatible with high-speed data acquisition and imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,21 It has been difficult to relate phase shift and, here, energy dissipation E dis , to a specific material property. 27 The underlying physical mechanism, i.e., the phase shift origins, can be readily discriminated by measuring the normalized energy dissipation E * dis curve (E * dis ¼ E dis /E max dis with E max dis the maximum of the E dis vs. A/A 0 curve), that is, independent of experimental parameters. 23,28 According to García, 23 either viscoelasticity or adhesion has its own unique features in the E * dis vs. A/A 0 and dE * dis /d(A/A 0 ) vs. A/A 0 curves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, in many real situations these contributions cannot be neglected, especially in air environments where the total energy dissipation cannot be assumed to come exclusively from viscoelasticity and where conservative interactions can lead to undesirable phenomena such as snap to contact and can introduce inaccuracies in the calculations using the above formulas. 40 To further address this issue we end our discussion with the inclusion of long range attractive forces in our simulations (see Fig. 6).…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%