2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10040623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Subgrid-Scale Variability in Particulate Matter with Respect to Satellite Aerosol Observations

Abstract: Recent use of satellite observations of aerosol optical depth (AOD) to characterize surface concentrations of particulate matter (PM) air pollution has proven extremely valuable in estimating exposures for health effects studies. While the spatial resolutions of satellite data provide far better coverage than existing fixed site surface monitoring stations, they are not able to capture atmospheric processes such as dilution of primary pollutants that vary at small spatial scales. As a result, small-scale varia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the machine learning methods presented here did not reach this level of performance for predicting PM 10 , our observed ability to predict PM 2.5 with far fewer ground monitors and no adjustments for meteorology is encouraging. The poor performance in predicting PM 10 is likely in part due to its spatial variability, which can be on the order of less than 1 km for coarse particles [26]. Due to data availability, we matched MISR observations with ground monitoring concentrations that were within 10 km, likely too large a spatial scale to detect associations with PM 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the machine learning methods presented here did not reach this level of performance for predicting PM 10 , our observed ability to predict PM 2.5 with far fewer ground monitors and no adjustments for meteorology is encouraging. The poor performance in predicting PM 10 is likely in part due to its spatial variability, which can be on the order of less than 1 km for coarse particles [26]. Due to data availability, we matched MISR observations with ground monitoring concentrations that were within 10 km, likely too large a spatial scale to detect associations with PM 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Prototype versions of the 4.4 km MISR product have already been used extensively over parts of southern and central California, and the current V23 product has been used over Mongolia to estimate PM with diameter less than 2.5 µm (PM 2.5 ), less than 10 µm (PM 10 ), and speciated PM 2.5 concentrations (Franklin et al, 2017(Franklin et al, , 2018bMeng et al, 2018). The 4.4 km MISR AOD product was proven, through cross-validation against surface monitoring stations, to capture PM 2.5 variably on a 4.4 km scale and to separate PM 2.5 and PM 10 size modes (Franklin et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Scene Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prototype versions of the 4.4 km MISR product have already been used extensively over parts of southern and central California and the current V23 product has been used over Mongolia to estimate PM2.5, PM10, and speciated PM2.5 concentrations (Franklin et al, 2017(Franklin et al, , 2018bMeng et al, 2018). The 4.4 km MISR AOD product was proved, through cross-validation against surface monitoring stations, to capture PM2.5 variably on a 4.4 km scale, and to separate PM2.5 and PM10 size modes (Franklin et al, 2018a). Ongoing studies are extending the MISR 4.4 km product application for predicting spatially resolved PM types to other highly polluted regions.…”
Section: Scene Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%