1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00272734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of soybean tissue culture cell lines resistant to methionine analogs

Abstract: Several hundred soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cell lines resistant to ethionine were isolated either with or without chemical mutagenesis. of these, 26 were found to contain 2 to 22 times higher than normal levels of uncombined methionine. These 26 cell lines also contained higher than normal levels of S-adenosylmethionine and S-methylmethionine, but the levels of free lysine, threonine, cysteine, valine, tyrosine and phenylalanine were not elevated. Isoleucine levels were only slightly elevated. These resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the resistant phenotype with high essential amino acid concentration could be isolated by somaclonal variation (Kim et al, 2004), mutagen treatment seem to be indispensable to the selection of maize callus cultures resistant to 5-methyl-DL DLtryptophan (5-MT), S-2-aminoethyl-L L -cysteine (AEC) and L L -lysine plus L L -threonine (LT) (Miao et al, 1988) and of Nicotiana sylvestris protoplast cultures resistant to AEC (Negrutiu et al, 1984). Furthermore, high NTG concentration resulted in an increase in ethionine resistant frequency in A. adsurgens (Table 1), similar results have been reported for soybean (Madison and Thompson, 1988) and Vigna Sinensis cell cultures (Ahmed et al, 1986).…”
Section: Isolation Of Resistant Colony Linessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the resistant phenotype with high essential amino acid concentration could be isolated by somaclonal variation (Kim et al, 2004), mutagen treatment seem to be indispensable to the selection of maize callus cultures resistant to 5-methyl-DL DLtryptophan (5-MT), S-2-aminoethyl-L L -cysteine (AEC) and L L -lysine plus L L -threonine (LT) (Miao et al, 1988) and of Nicotiana sylvestris protoplast cultures resistant to AEC (Negrutiu et al, 1984). Furthermore, high NTG concentration resulted in an increase in ethionine resistant frequency in A. adsurgens (Table 1), similar results have been reported for soybean (Madison and Thompson, 1988) and Vigna Sinensis cell cultures (Ahmed et al, 1986).…”
Section: Isolation Of Resistant Colony Linessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…ETH is a chemical analog of methionine and has been used to select variants with increased concentrations of free methionine in several species including alfalfa (Reisch et al, 1981), carrot (Widholm, 1976), potato (Langille et al, 1998), soybean (Madison and Thompson, 1988;Imsande, 2001), tobacco (Gonzales et al, 1984), Arabidopsis thaliana (Inaba et al, 1994;Goto et al, 2002;Shen et al, 2002), Aspargua officinalis (Curtiss et al, 1987) and Vigna sinensis (Ahmed et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethionine is a toxic analogue of Met (Alix 1982) that has been used to isolate Met over-accumulating mutants of bacteria (Kappy and Metzenberg 1965) and yeast (Sorsoli et al 1964, Mertz andSpence 1972). The phenotype of ethionine-resistance has also been used to successfully identify plant cell lines (Widholm 1976, Reish et al 1981, Gonzales et al 1984, Madison and Thompson 1988 and plant mutants , Bartlem et al 2000) that overaccumulate soluble Met.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their similarity in chemical structure and composition, an increased concentration of methionine lessens the toxicity of low concentrations of ethionine. Thus, low concentrations of ethionine have been used successfully to select and identify methionine over‐producing variants, including soybean tissue culture lines (Gonzales et al, 1984; Inaba et al, 1994; Langille et al, 1998; Madison and Thompson, 1988). All 26 of the ethionine‐resistant soybean tissue culture lines isolated contained an elevated internal methionine concentration, the mean of which, 41.7 nmol g −1 fresh weight of callus, was 8.7 fold greater than that of the parental line (Madison and Thompson, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%