2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Small Interfering RNAs Derived from Sugarcane Mosaic Virus in Infected Maize Plants by Deep Sequencing

Abstract: RNA silencing is a conserved surveillance mechanism against viruses in plants. It is mediated by Dicer-like (DCL) proteins producing small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which guide specific Argonaute (AGO)-containing complexes to inactivate viral genomes and may promote the silencing of host mRNAs. In this study, we obtained the profile of virus-derived siRNAs (vsiRNAs) from Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) in infected maize (Zea mays L.) plants by deep sequencing. Our data showed that vsiRNAs which derived almost e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
9
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7), while for 21-22 nt vsRNAs the enrichment was not significant, even if preference for 5 terminal A and U was observed (not shown). Preference for A/U terminal nucleotides compared to G/C was described in previous vsRNA analyses, for instance for RSV in rice and N. benthamiana plants (Yan et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2012), tomato yellow leaf curl China virus in tomato (Yang et al, 2011), potato virus Y in potato (Naveed et al, 2014), sugarcane mosaic virus in maize (Xia et al, 2014), and TSWV in tomato and N. benthamiana (Mitter et al, 2013;Margaria et al, 2015a). Preferential sorting of small RNAs into AGO complexes has been shown to be directed by the 5 terminal nucleotide (Takeda et al, 2008;Mi et al, 2008;Mallory and Vaucheret, 2010).…”
Section: Sense Vsrnas Are Enriched For Nss But Not For Nsm Genementioning
confidence: 78%
“…7), while for 21-22 nt vsRNAs the enrichment was not significant, even if preference for 5 terminal A and U was observed (not shown). Preference for A/U terminal nucleotides compared to G/C was described in previous vsRNA analyses, for instance for RSV in rice and N. benthamiana plants (Yan et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2012), tomato yellow leaf curl China virus in tomato (Yang et al, 2011), potato virus Y in potato (Naveed et al, 2014), sugarcane mosaic virus in maize (Xia et al, 2014), and TSWV in tomato and N. benthamiana (Mitter et al, 2013;Margaria et al, 2015a). Preferential sorting of small RNAs into AGO complexes has been shown to be directed by the 5 terminal nucleotide (Takeda et al, 2008;Mi et al, 2008;Mallory and Vaucheret, 2010).…”
Section: Sense Vsrnas Are Enriched For Nss But Not For Nsm Genementioning
confidence: 78%
“…The probes were labeled, and the blots were probed and washed as reported previously (Xia et al, 2016). Approximately 30-mg total RNA samples were prepared to detect GFP siRNAs, and the blots were probed and washed as described previously (Xia et al, 2014). Probe sequences used for detection of the GFP siRNAs are shown in Supplemental Table S3.…”
Section: Gfp Imaging and Rna Gel-blot Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of vsRNAs accumulation in cotton infected by cotton leaf roll dwarf virus (a single-stranded positive sense RNA virus containing six open reading frames) showed equivalent amounts of sense and antisense vsRNAs (Silva et al, 2011), as also Table 1 for specific treatments. observed in maize infected by sugarcane mosaic virus (Xia et al, 2014). DsRNA-like secondary structures within the single-stranded viral RNA, have been reported to likely be the main source of vsRNAs; in other cases, dsRNA replication-intermediates could be the source of vsRNAs, thus resulting in equal amounts of sense and antisense sRNA reads (Molnar et al, 2005;Szittya et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010;Pantaleo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Nss-antisense Vsrnas Are Enriched In Both Wt and Nss-defectimentioning
confidence: 99%