2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00478-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients reveals highly potent neutralizing IgA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
44
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we explored the sensitivity and specificity for these different antibodies at earlier time points to examine whether our IgA/IgM/IgG combined method is good enough for the diagnosis of COVID-19 patients at the early stage of disease development. We collected 49 serum samples from the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, including 34 serum samples from healthy people and 15 serum samples from qPCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients within 4–10 days post-symptom onset, considered as the early stage of the disease 36 ( Table S4 ). As shown in Figure 5 , with detailed numbers in Table S5 , the corresponding sensitivities of IgA, IgM, and IgG were 93.3% (14/15), 86.7% (13/15), and 66.7% (10/15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, we explored the sensitivity and specificity for these different antibodies at earlier time points to examine whether our IgA/IgM/IgG combined method is good enough for the diagnosis of COVID-19 patients at the early stage of disease development. We collected 49 serum samples from the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, including 34 serum samples from healthy people and 15 serum samples from qPCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients within 4–10 days post-symptom onset, considered as the early stage of the disease 36 ( Table S4 ). As shown in Figure 5 , with detailed numbers in Table S5 , the corresponding sensitivities of IgA, IgM, and IgG were 93.3% (14/15), 86.7% (13/15), and 66.7% (10/15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBD and anti-RBD antibodies (IgA/IgM/IgG) were purified as described previously. 36 Briefly, to make the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 RBD, a leader sequence, a sequence encoding spike protein RBD, and a human IgG1-Fc were fused together. This sequence was cloned into pTT5 vector and then transiently transfected into HEK293F cells through polyethylenimine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the importance for screening antibodies in saliva in addition to serum. There is increasing evidence in favor of a key role for IgA in early virus neutralization 24 : (i) early SARS-CoV-2-specific responses are typically dominated by the IgA isotype, (ii) peripheral expansion of IgA-plasmablasts with mucosal-homing shortly after the onset of symptoms and peak during the third week of the disease, and (iii) IgA may contribute to a much larger extent to virus neutralization as compared to IgG 16,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemiluminescence-based kits to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, IgM, and IgG antibodies were developed by Kangrun Biotech (Guangzhou, China), in which the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein was coated onto magnetic particles to capture SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, IgM, and IgG in patient samples [ 46 ]. Secondary acridinium-conjugated antibodies were used for detecting IgA, IgM, and IgG.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detected chemiluminescent signals were calculated as relative light units (RLU) (over background signal, the cut-off RLU value for anti-RBD IgA, IgM, and IgG was 32,189, 17,538, and 9971, respectively). These kits have been validated in a large set of serum samples and showed high sensitivities and specificities [ 45 , 46 ]. Serum samples were collected via the centrifugation of whole blood in test tubes at 1000× g for 15 min at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%