2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of pyrolysis products formed from styrene-1,2-unit heterosequence of styrene–butadiene copolymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can lead to a higher temperature applied to the small sample rather than the large one. In general, the production rate of a monomer is faster than that of a dimer as the pyrolysis temperature increases [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. A calibration curve built with the reference samples is used to determine the TWP contents in environmental samples, as introduced previously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to a higher temperature applied to the small sample rather than the large one. In general, the production rate of a monomer is faster than that of a dimer as the pyrolysis temperature increases [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. A calibration curve built with the reference samples is used to determine the TWP contents in environmental samples, as introduced previously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Styrene was detected, but VCH was rarely observed. If there was SBR component in the PM 2.5 samples, besides styrene and VCH, 2-phenylpropene (2-PP), 3-phenylcyclopentene (3-PCP), and/or 4-phenylcyclohexene (4-PCH) should be detected because they are generated from the styrene-butadiene heterosequences [ 23 , 40 , 41 ]. However, 2-PP, 3-PCP, and 4-PCH were not detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that there was no BR component in the PM samples. There are various principal pyrolysis products of SBR, such as 1,3-butadiene, VCH, styrene, 2-phenylpropene (2-PP), 3-phenylcyclopentene (3-PCP), and 4-phenylcyclohexene (4-PCH) [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. If there were SBR components in the PM samples, some of them must have been detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%