2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of primary platinum resistance in an era of biologic agents and novel chemotherapeutic design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers like Slaughter and colleagues investigated 330 women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer and found that 25% of patients were primary platinum resistant (PPR), and the median PFS and OS of PPR patients were 4.2 and 17.8 months, respectively ( 30 ). Thomas et al had similar report, PPR manifested earlier is a bad prognosis for EOC patients, and also found that neither age, primary treatment, RD, and histology nor clinical trial was associated with PPR ( 31 ). Great progress has been made in recent years in making the mechanisms of platinum resistance clear in EOC, which mainly consist of constitutional germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2, epigenetic changes, and molecular anomalies of DNA repair pathways ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Researchers like Slaughter and colleagues investigated 330 women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer and found that 25% of patients were primary platinum resistant (PPR), and the median PFS and OS of PPR patients were 4.2 and 17.8 months, respectively ( 30 ). Thomas et al had similar report, PPR manifested earlier is a bad prognosis for EOC patients, and also found that neither age, primary treatment, RD, and histology nor clinical trial was associated with PPR ( 31 ). Great progress has been made in recent years in making the mechanisms of platinum resistance clear in EOC, which mainly consist of constitutional germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2, epigenetic changes, and molecular anomalies of DNA repair pathways ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%