2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51541-0_148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Prebake Anodes by Micro X-ray Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing with the XCT measurements of other carbon refractory materials, the measured total porosity was higher than for the carbon anodes (1.96-3.46%) investigated by Rørvik et al [27], while the continuous porosity was much lower than for amorphous carbon blocks (6-7%) investigated by the Steenkamp et al [28]. However, it should be noted that those measurements were performed for XCT investigations with different voxel sizes (7.3 × 7.3 × 7.3 µm 3 [28] and 27 × 27 × 27 µm 3 [27]) than in this study. Results showed that even using this relatively high resolution (16 × 16 × 16 µm 3 ), we are able to observe the elements of continuous pore structure, which serve as a preferred flow path for molten metal infiltration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing with the XCT measurements of other carbon refractory materials, the measured total porosity was higher than for the carbon anodes (1.96-3.46%) investigated by Rørvik et al [27], while the continuous porosity was much lower than for amorphous carbon blocks (6-7%) investigated by the Steenkamp et al [28]. However, it should be noted that those measurements were performed for XCT investigations with different voxel sizes (7.3 × 7.3 × 7.3 µm 3 [28] and 27 × 27 × 27 µm 3 [27]) than in this study. Results showed that even using this relatively high resolution (16 × 16 × 16 µm 3 ), we are able to observe the elements of continuous pore structure, which serve as a preferred flow path for molten metal infiltration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…z.o.o., Racibórz, Poland) using other methods, i.e., mercury intrusion porosimetry (16.62 ± 1.09%) or helium porosimetry (18.66 ± 0.70%) [41]. Comparing with the XCT measurements of other carbon refractory materials, the measured total porosity was higher than for the carbon anodes (1.96-3.46%) investigated by Rørvik et al [27], while the continuous porosity was much lower than for amorphous carbon blocks (6-7%) investigated by the Steenkamp et al [28]. However, it should be noted that those measurements were performed for XCT investigations with different voxel sizes (7.3 × 7.3 × 7.3 µm 3 [28] and 27 × 27 × 27 µm 3 [27]) than in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Porosity was also investigated using an optical microscope (high-end Leica/Reichert MeF3A metallurgical optical reflected light microscope) and a custom written macro for the NIH software as described by Rørvik and Øye. 39 The porosity size range of the measurements using this method was 5-10000 μm diameter. Two parallel samples were tested for all these analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%