2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of plastics and their ecotoxicological effects in the Lambro River (N. Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Discrepancies between laboratory and environmental conditions are, for example, (i) concentrations frequently used in in-vitro assays are frequently much higher than those found in the environment, and this could lead to experimental artifacts [37]; (ii) the involvement of very few other co-occurrent pollutants, when the complexity of the pollution status of the aquatic environments suggest that more complex contaminant matrix should be included in toxicological studies [38]; (iii) the investigation of short term exposure effect, compared to the lifetime of the hazard in nature [39]; (iv) the utilization of microbiologically clean MPs, when the possible danger represented by the biofilm presence and its composition has now been well described [40,41]. Since toxicological investigations that tried to counteract some of these aspects into account are still few [39,42,43], it is important to consider the possible harmful effects related to microplastics that can be highlighted by studies on wild catches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrepancies between laboratory and environmental conditions are, for example, (i) concentrations frequently used in in-vitro assays are frequently much higher than those found in the environment, and this could lead to experimental artifacts [37]; (ii) the involvement of very few other co-occurrent pollutants, when the complexity of the pollution status of the aquatic environments suggest that more complex contaminant matrix should be included in toxicological studies [38]; (iii) the investigation of short term exposure effect, compared to the lifetime of the hazard in nature [39]; (iv) the utilization of microbiologically clean MPs, when the possible danger represented by the biofilm presence and its composition has now been well described [40,41]. Since toxicological investigations that tried to counteract some of these aspects into account are still few [39,42,43], it is important to consider the possible harmful effects related to microplastics that can be highlighted by studies on wild catches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prevalence of PEST and PA fibers was observed. Both polymers are secondary plastics of textile origin, so likely associated with land-based origin such as from the production of clothing and with the release from washing machines [70][71][72]. In addition, both kinds of polymers can also be released from different fishing and aquaculture tools, such as ropes and nets [73].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relative to studies related to the monitoring of conventional (micro)plastics, few have reported the presence of tire particles in the environment [ 17 , 20 ]. Indeed, the main detected plastics, e.g., in aqueous matrices, are constituted by polymers, such as polystyrene (PS), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyester (PEST), polyacrylate (PAK) and polyamide [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. In this context, it is important to consider that tire particles are difficult to detect with the identification methodologies of conventional (micro)plastics, such as the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), due to the lack of appropriate reference standards, as well as the presence of carbon black in tires, which absorbs in the infrared region [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%