2018
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Plasmodium Lactate Dehydrogenase and Histidine-Rich Protein 2 Clearance Patterns via Rapid On-Bead Detection from a Single Dried Blood Spot

Abstract: Abstract.A rapid, on-bead enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) and Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) was adapted for use with dried blood spot (DBS) samples. This assay detected both biomarkers from a single DBS sample with only 45 minutes of total incubation time and detection limits of 600 ± 500 pM (pLDH) and 69 ± 30 pM (HRP2), corresponding to 150 and 24 parasites/μL, respectively. This sensitive and reproducible on-bead detection method was used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
20
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(43 reference statements)
3
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration of eluted PfHRP2 from DBS to be equivalent to approximately a 1:20 dilution from whole blood, similarly to previously reported data (40). Differently, for pLDH we found that antigen concentration in eluted DBS corresponds to a 1:60 whole blood dilution, which differs from previously published data showing no differences in antigen recovery between PfHRP2 and pLDH (20). However, such differences could be explained by the different extraction methodologies and storage conditions used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concentration of eluted PfHRP2 from DBS to be equivalent to approximately a 1:20 dilution from whole blood, similarly to previously reported data (40). Differently, for pLDH we found that antigen concentration in eluted DBS corresponds to a 1:60 whole blood dilution, which differs from previously published data showing no differences in antigen recovery between PfHRP2 and pLDH (20). However, such differences could be explained by the different extraction methodologies and storage conditions used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the assay can also quantify Pv pLDH down to 1211.6 pg/ml. The assay analytical sensitivity to detect PfHRP2 is comparable to that of a recently developed bead suspension assay based on Luminex technology (25), as well as to other immunoassays that use different technologies (20,28). This suggests that with the current technology available for the quantification of PfHRP2 using antibodies, the lowest limit of detection achievable is in the range of 0.5 to 10 pg/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Additionally, the assay can also quantify P. vivax pLDH down to 1211.6 pg/ml. The assay analytical sensitivity to detect PfHRP2 is comparable to that of a recently developed bead suspension assay based on Luminex technology [25], as well as to other immunoassays that use different technologies [20,27]. This suggests that with the current technology available for the quantification of PfHRP2 using antibodies, the lowest limit of detection achievable is in the range of 0.5-10 pg/ ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In contrast to PfHRP2, pLDH does not persist in blood after clearance of malaria infections and is therefore a better marker of acute and current infection [19]. Upon treatment, pLDH clearance in blood has been shown to closely track with that of parasites, suggesting pLDH to be a suitable predictor for treatment failure [20]. However, sensitivity of RDTs based on this antigen is generally lower than that of PfHRP2-based RDTs [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because PfHRP2 antigenemia can persist for weeks, they can produce false-positive results well after resolution of infection. (6) Additionally, increasing reports of false-negative RDT results due to P. falciparum parasites that escape detection due to deletion mutations of the pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes raise concern that PfHRP2-based RDTs may be threatened in select regions of Africa. (7, 8) While microscopy is the traditional gold-standard for malaria diagnosis, it is only sporadically available throughout much of Africa because performance is highly operator dependent, it is labor-intensive, and it requires careful, sustained training of personnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%