1994
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(94)90295-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of phase modulated ultrashort pulses using single-shot autocorrelator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pulse duration from Fourier transformation (FT) of the spectrum is much shorter than the measured one due to the assumption of zero phase difference, but the shape is closer to the secant function, as shown in Figure 5(b). With the measured pulse duration of 23 fs for a sech 2 pulse shape, the value of the time-bandwidth product ∆t∆ν is 0.576, indicating that the laser pulse is not bandwidthlimited [16]. The diverging image of the SH signal observed in the CCD located 25 or 30 cm from the crystal could be evidence of positive chirp [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The pulse duration from Fourier transformation (FT) of the spectrum is much shorter than the measured one due to the assumption of zero phase difference, but the shape is closer to the secant function, as shown in Figure 5(b). With the measured pulse duration of 23 fs for a sech 2 pulse shape, the value of the time-bandwidth product ∆t∆ν is 0.576, indicating that the laser pulse is not bandwidthlimited [16]. The diverging image of the SH signal observed in the CCD located 25 or 30 cm from the crystal could be evidence of positive chirp [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although this condition is not strictly fulfilled in our experiment, we have maintained the interaction angle small enough to make this disturbance negligible. However, a temporal chirp in the object pulse could give rise to a spatial phase distortion of the SF wavefront (32). Although this does not affect the results obtained with the confocal configuration (see Fig.…”
Section: Interaction Anglementioning
confidence: 94%