2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of particulate and gaseous pollutants emitted during operation of a desktop 3D printer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
125
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
125
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The printer was placed in a 0.13 m 3 enclosure, which is a common practice during FDM 3D printing, especially using ABS filaments due to the relatively high thermal shrinkage of this material which might result in the object detaching from the build plate mid-print as it cools unevenly. While in some previous studies much larger enclosures were used [ 31 ] which provide a good approximation of a scenario in which the user is exposed to emissions from a free-standing 3D printer, we have focused on a scenario in which the printer is enclosed. Usually, this is done using a dedicated enclosure supplied by the manufacturer of the 3D printer, in which case the volume of the enclosure might be smaller than the one used in the experiments, which was designed primarily to facilitate the sampling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The printer was placed in a 0.13 m 3 enclosure, which is a common practice during FDM 3D printing, especially using ABS filaments due to the relatively high thermal shrinkage of this material which might result in the object detaching from the build plate mid-print as it cools unevenly. While in some previous studies much larger enclosures were used [ 31 ] which provide a good approximation of a scenario in which the user is exposed to emissions from a free-standing 3D printer, we have focused on a scenario in which the printer is enclosed. Usually, this is done using a dedicated enclosure supplied by the manufacturer of the 3D printer, in which case the volume of the enclosure might be smaller than the one used in the experiments, which was designed primarily to facilitate the sampling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total volatile organic compound (TVOC) hit the highest peak at post printing period where 0.5 ppm. The TVOC emissions influenced by the powder cake that has been sintered, and this remarkably indicates the sintered powder during post-printing process will contribute to the increment of TVOC [7], [39]- [42]. Formaldehyde does not show any significant changes during the whole SLS process.…”
Section: Indoor Air Emissionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The laser wavelength is 0.3mm and 0.1mm thickness of powder layer for every rotating roller. Calibration block from the manufacturer [7], [31] with dimension 143mm x 143 mm x 23 mm was set to be print in this study as depicted in Figure 2. The laboratory is set to be 20 °C and relative humidity to be maintained around 60% [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to processes such as casting, forging and machining, workers do not experience long-term exposure to noise and oil mist from metal working [52]. However, 3D printing is being associated with the release of volatile and very volatile organic chemicals and billions of airborne particles per minute with potential for inhalation and consequent health risks [53,54]. Although many industrial 3D printers are enclosed, workers may still be exposed to inhalation risks when retrieving the printed parts.…”
Section: Workforcementioning
confidence: 99%