2014
DOI: 10.3844/ajabssp.2014.450.456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch and Rice Husk Biochars and Their Potential to Adsorb Arsenic and Cadmium

Abstract: Biochar as a new soil amendment has a potential in controlling the fate of trace elements in the soil system. However, the production of biochar from different feedstocks and pyrolysis conditions resulted in variable biochar properties which have an influence on trace elements availability. The experimental works are focused on physical and chemical properties of biochars produced from Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) and Rice Husk (RH) as heavy metals adsorbents. The morphology of EFB biochar comprise rigid structure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk posed by heavy metals could be reduced with the co-application of organic amendments such as rice husk biochar (RH) and/or empty fruit bunch (EFB). Previous studies show that the sorption of such heavy metals (i.e., Cd, Cu, Zn, Fe, As) has the ability to bind to soil particles, hence reducing the bioavailability of the heavy metals in the soil solution [28][29][30][31]. For example, based on Langmuir's adsorption model, the maximum adsorption capacity (q max ) of EFB biochar for As was 0.42 mg g −1 , which was higher than RH biochar (0.35 mg g −1 ) [32].…”
Section: Physico-chemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk posed by heavy metals could be reduced with the co-application of organic amendments such as rice husk biochar (RH) and/or empty fruit bunch (EFB). Previous studies show that the sorption of such heavy metals (i.e., Cd, Cu, Zn, Fe, As) has the ability to bind to soil particles, hence reducing the bioavailability of the heavy metals in the soil solution [28][29][30][31]. For example, based on Langmuir's adsorption model, the maximum adsorption capacity (q max ) of EFB biochar for As was 0.42 mg g −1 , which was higher than RH biochar (0.35 mg g −1 ) [32].…”
Section: Physico-chemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest pH was observed in RH1, with a reading of 7.87. Biochars from the pyrolysis processes were usually alkaline in nature with pH > 7.00 (Bagreev et al 2001;Sari et al 2014). Adding biochar into deionized water increases the solution pH and biochar produced at higher temperatures exhibit a higher pH.…”
Section: Chemical Characterization Of Various Biocharsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high production rate of EFB makes it cheap and renewable feedstock for biochar production. Several studies have been reported on the application of empty fruit bunch biochar (EFBB) as a low cost adsorbent for the removal of contaminants from the environment [7][8][9][10]. The EFB is a lignocellulosic material which consists of 38.1-59.7 wt% cellulose, 16.8−22.1 wt% hemicellulose and 10.5−18.1 wt% lignin [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%