2005
DOI: 10.1124/mol.105.012005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Novel Aryl-Ether, Biaryl, and Fluorene Aspartic Acid and Diaminopropionic Acid Analogs as Potent Inhibitors of the High-Affinity Glutamate Transporter EAAT2

Abstract: In this study, we describe the pharmacological characterization of novel aryl-ether, biaryl, and fluorene aspartic acid and diaminopropionic acid analogs as potent inhibitors of EAAT2, the predominant glutamate transporter in forebrain regions. The rank order of potency determined for the inhibition of human EAAT2 was(WAY-211686) (IC 50 ϭ 190 Ϯ 10 nM). WAY-213613 was the most selective of the compounds examined, with IC 50 values for inhibition of EAAT1 and EAAT3 of 5 and 3.8 M, respectively, corresponding to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the folded-type glutamate analogs, L-CCG-III (Nakamura et al, 1993) 3 H]ETB-TBOA binding to EAAT2 only at a concentration of 1 mM, although it was less potent in our preparations than in other reports (Shimamoto et al, 1998 (Aprico et al, 2001). Recently EAAT2-preferring blockers have been reported (Dunlop et al, 2003(Dunlop et al, , 2005Bunch et al, 2006), but their effects on EAAT4 and EAAT5 are unknown. Characterization of these compounds in the binding assay developed here may further elucidate their specificity.…”
Section: Eaat Inhibitors Displaced [mentioning
confidence: 38%
“…One of the folded-type glutamate analogs, L-CCG-III (Nakamura et al, 1993) 3 H]ETB-TBOA binding to EAAT2 only at a concentration of 1 mM, although it was less potent in our preparations than in other reports (Shimamoto et al, 1998 (Aprico et al, 2001). Recently EAAT2-preferring blockers have been reported (Dunlop et al, 2003(Dunlop et al, , 2005Bunch et al, 2006), but their effects on EAAT4 and EAAT5 are unknown. Characterization of these compounds in the binding assay developed here may further elucidate their specificity.…”
Section: Eaat Inhibitors Displaced [mentioning
confidence: 38%
“…The effects of (Ϫ) These data question the hypothesis that synaptosomal EAATs correspond only to EAAT2/GLT1 transporters (Dunlop et al, 1999(Dunlop et al, , 2005Tan et al, 1999) and identify our novel compounds as interesting pharmacological tools for further investigating the nature of presynaptic transporters (Danbolt, 2001). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…As substrate inhibitors the set includes: 4-methylglutamate isomers (4)(5), [42] l-threo-b-hydroxyaspartate (THA, 6), [6] l-threo-4-hydroxyglutamate (7), [42] l-sulphate-O-serine (l-SOS, 8), [9] three cyclopropyl derivatives (namely, l-CCG-III, 9, d-CCG-I, 10, and l-CCG-IV, 11), [44] four pyrrolidine dicarboxylates (namely, t-2,4 PDC, 12, 2,4MPDC, 13, l-3,4MPDC, 14, 4-Methyl-2,4 PDC, 15), [42] and cis-aminocyclobutyl dicarboxylate (cis-ABCD, 16). [9] Figure 2 includes the nontransported blockers which can be divided in three main groups: b-hydroxyaspartate derivatives (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26), [45,46] aspartic acid amides (27)(28)(29)(30), [47] and diaminopropionic acid analogues (DAPAs, 31-32). [48] The biological activities were measured as IC 50 (mm) by the inhibition of l-glutamate uptake in cells transiently expressing EAAT1 (as compiled in Table 2).…”
Section: Ligand Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%