2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5116121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of non-linearities through mechanical squeezing in levitated optomechanics

Abstract: We demonstrate a technique to estimate the strength of non-linearities present in the trapping potential of an optically levitated nanoparticle. By applying a brief pulsed reduction in trapping laser power of the system such as to squeeze the phase space distribution and then matching the time evolution of the shape of the phase space distribution to that of numerical simulations, one can estimate the strength of the non-linearity present in the system. We apply this technique to estimate the strength of the D… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, all the simulations have been performed using parameters of current underdamped experiments 12 , together with the parameters of cubic optical potential 29 , 30 directly motivating our predictions to be experimentally tested to witness these new nonlinear mechanical phenomena. However, the analysis of the presented regime is also applicable to other underdamped experiments 31 33 . The first point worth experimentally verifying, shown in Figs.…”
Section: Conclusion For Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, all the simulations have been performed using parameters of current underdamped experiments 12 , together with the parameters of cubic optical potential 29 , 30 directly motivating our predictions to be experimentally tested to witness these new nonlinear mechanical phenomena. However, the analysis of the presented regime is also applicable to other underdamped experiments 31 33 . The first point worth experimentally verifying, shown in Figs.…”
Section: Conclusion For Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the low pressure limit the particle is deep in the underdamped regime so that the instantaneous particle speed and acceleration become new transient quantities to be first explored and later exploited for applications. In this paper we simulate and analyse nonlinear ballistic effects for instantaneous velocity and acceleration induced by the initial position uncertainty, and predict the experimental regime where such phenomena are visible using parameters for current setups in laboratories 12 , 31 33 . We observe that the only requirement for a reliable experimental observation is a reduction of initial velocity uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 . Moreover, this PSD approach is not suitable for current investigation and use of transient out-of-equilibrium coherent effects faster than any heating of the motion 40 . After the cooling of levitating systems to the ground state 37 , such estimation of the Duffing oscillator from fast transient effects are crucial for upcoming studies of quantum effects 50 54 .…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our results with the commonly used PSD method and, unlike Refs. 18,40 , we obtain the Duffing coefficient of nonlinearity without any external driving force which could affect the system parameters and would be undesirable for experimental studies of quantum effects. Moreover, the determined damping coefficient follows well the theoretical prediction down into low pressures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A straightforward generalization of our schemes should allow the creation of two-mode squeezing between two motional modes of the particle; in this context, we note that both parametric [47] and dissipative [48] two-mode me- chanical squeezing have been realized in optomechanical systems. In the long term, full quantum control of motion should be possible, first in the Gaussian (via linear coupling of all three motional modes to the same cavity mode) and later in the non-Gaussian regime (when nonlinear optomechanical interactions or mechanical potentials are added [49][50][51][52]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%