2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11047-005-4460-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Non-crosshybridizing DNA Oligonucleotides Manufactured in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more details we refer the reader e.g. to [5,12,13]. Here we apply the formal language approach which has been used in [2,7,8,10,11] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details we refer the reader e.g. to [5,12,13]. Here we apply the formal language approach which has been used in [2,7,8,10,11] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermodynamical methods such as those in [30,33] provide the most precise results but are computationally the most expensive. Experimental studies trying to construct DNA codes in vitro with the help of the PCR operation can be found, e.g., in [16,31]. An opposite approach relying solely on the WK complementarity allows for fastest but least precise methods (see, e.g., [54,60,65] as examples).…”
Section: Dna Encoding: Problem Setting and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts to construct noncrosshybridizing sets in silico using various methods such as templates and error-correcting codes (Arita et al, 2002) or heuristic search (Tulpan et al, 2005) tended to produce relatively small sets, likely far from optimal. Other methods to create noncrosshybridizing sets in vitro (Chen et al, 2006) are attractive for being able to produce a maximal physical set. However, they suffer from the challenge of identifying precisely its size and, more importantly, the composition of the sequences, hence little is learned for a more principled understanding of the complexity of DNA codeword design and, more importantly, the structure of the Gibbs energy landscapes.…”
Section: Dna Codes Gibbs Energies and Dna Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Codeword Design problem has seen some progress in the last decade in at least two subareas. First, in searching and/or building such DNA code sets Deaton et al, 2006;Tulpan et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2006), in which the size of feasible computational problems or self-assembled nanostructures is usually directly related to the largest ensemble of DNA molecules that satisfy a given set of crosshybridization and noncrosshybrization constraints. The second and perhaps more important area deals with developing the appropriate theoretical framework to understand and analyze this type of problems, organize the knowledge about the subject in a systematic manner, and explore the power and limitations of biomolecules at large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation