2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-018-4769-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Ni-Based Superalloy Built by Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This kind of approach allows the production of parts with free design constraint enabling the construction of integrated components, lightweight structures or topologically optimized geometries [14,15]. Metal AM techniques can be divided into powder bed fusion (PBF) techniques [16][17][18][19] and directed energy deposition (DED) techniques [20,21]. With respect to the PBF systems, DED process has been used not only to produce metallic components [22] but also has been employed to repair the high value parts [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of approach allows the production of parts with free design constraint enabling the construction of integrated components, lightweight structures or topologically optimized geometries [14,15]. Metal AM techniques can be divided into powder bed fusion (PBF) techniques [16][17][18][19] and directed energy deposition (DED) techniques [20,21]. With respect to the PBF systems, DED process has been used not only to produce metallic components [22] but also has been employed to repair the high value parts [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests one possible explanation: the SLM material is largely deformed and is not fully recovered after heat treatment. Such a possibility was not mentioned in Kuo et al [34,35] Here, we construct recrystallization fraction maps on a forged IN718 and SLM HA specimen, of which the forged IN718 is the same batch as in Gustafsson and Lundstro¨m [19] and is in as-received heat-treated condition, and the SLM HA is the one studied in the present study and is in as-heat-treated condition. As shown in Figure 10, the forged counterpart has a 69.79 pct recrystallization fraction, which is much higher than the 3.02 pct of the SLM HA condition.…”
Section: Creep At 823 K (550 C)? a General Discussion On Inferior Creep Resistance Of Slm In718mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To the best of our knowledge, creep tests on SLM IN718 reported in the literature have been conducted at 903 K (630 C) [33] and 923 K (650 C). [34,35] Specifically, in Reference 35, under 923 K (650 C)/550 MPa, the creep properties of SLM IN718 are noticeably inferior to the cast&wrought (C&W) counterpart: the steady creep regime is almost absent, and the onset of tertiary creep occurs quite early for both the as-built and heat-treated conditions. The early onset of tertiary creep [35] is believed to be consistent with the relatively fast crack growth rate in the present SLM cases, which is associated with the high-stress intensity exponent m in Figure 8.…”
Section: A Damage Mechanism: Creep or Environmentally Assisted Grain Boundary Attack?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But for the SLM counterpart, such an inferior creep resistance can not be simply attributed to the presence of internal defects if almost porosity-free is assumed after HIP. Such an inferiority of HIP-ed SLM creep resistance is not clearly addressed in these studies, even though Kuo et al [132,151] claimed that HIP can introduce serrated boundaries which should be beneficial to the creep performance. Similarly, Witkin et al [152] reported an anomalous and inferior notch rupture behaviour of HIP and heat treated SLM IN718 at 650 • C in combination stress rupture test, which shows zero elongation and is supposed to not be so if comparing to the wrought IN718.…”
Section: Ebm and Slm In718mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Popovich et al [149] reported that the heat-treated SLM IN718 has shown inferior creep resistance to the wrought counterpart under 690 MPa at 650 • C, which might be attributed to the porosities even though the overall porosity fraction is acceptably low. Further, Kuo et al [132,150,151] systematically studied the effects of post treatment (HIP and heat treatment) on creep properties of SLM IN718 under 550 MPa at 650 • C, suggesting that HIP is more efficient than heat treatment to improve the creep resistance of SLM components. Interestingly, if to carefully compare the steady-state creep rate and creep strain between EBM, SLM and C&W (cast & wrought) IN718 listed in [132,151], one can find that even after HIP the SLM IN718 still shows relatively inferior creep resistance to the C&W counterpart, and the EBM IN718 is slightly better than the SLM IN718 but similarly inferior to the C&W counterpart.…”
Section: Ebm and Slm In718mentioning
confidence: 99%