2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1056-8719(03)00044-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of nasal obstruction in the allergic guinea pig using the forced oscillation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The ability to reliably evaluate changes in nasal cavity patency in animals is of paramount importance in the study of pathophysiology and the preclinical evaluation of novel treatments for allergic rhinitis. So far, small animals such as rat 7 and guinea pig, 8 or larger animals such as cat 9 and dog, 10 have been used to generate important information on nasal physiology and pathophysiology. Dynamic techniques require invasive procedures, and the experimental animal cannot survive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The ability to reliably evaluate changes in nasal cavity patency in animals is of paramount importance in the study of pathophysiology and the preclinical evaluation of novel treatments for allergic rhinitis. So far, small animals such as rat 7 and guinea pig, 8 or larger animals such as cat 9 and dog, 10 have been used to generate important information on nasal physiology and pathophysiology. Dynamic techniques require invasive procedures, and the experimental animal cannot survive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in guinea pigs, allergen-induced nasal resistance was reversed by antihistamines, but not by an adrenergic agonist (McLeod et al 2002). These results disagree with the ameliorative effects of commonly used vasoconstrictors in humans.…”
Section: Nasal Cavitymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For example, in guinea pigs, allergen-induced nasal resistance was reversed by antihistamines, but not by an adrenergic agonist [29]. These results disagree with the ameliorative effects of commonly used vasoconstrictors in humans.…”
Section: Nasal Obstructionmentioning
confidence: 80%