2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-016-1191-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of nanocellulose recovery from Elaeis guineensis frond for sustainable development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding complements a previous study on recovery of nanocellulose from OPF which obtained crystallinity index of 57.7%. 19 Crystallinity index obtained in this study was slightly lower than theirs and this could be attributed to the time of acid hydrolysis. A longer hydrolysis time may have partially degraded the crystalline structure of cellulose nancrystals hence resulted in a lower crystallinity index in this study.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This finding complements a previous study on recovery of nanocellulose from OPF which obtained crystallinity index of 57.7%. 19 Crystallinity index obtained in this study was slightly lower than theirs and this could be attributed to the time of acid hydrolysis. A longer hydrolysis time may have partially degraded the crystalline structure of cellulose nancrystals hence resulted in a lower crystallinity index in this study.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…In other words, Cs biocomposites tend to have higher cross‐linking with the addition of OPF nanocellulose compared with COM nanocellulose. This finding may be attributed to the fact that OPF nanocellulose is smaller in size as compared with COM nanocellulose which could lead to the higher surface area available for interaction with Cs matrix . This observation suggests that OPF nanocellulose is a good candidate for producing higher degree of cross‐linking in Cs biocomposites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aprotic solvent, especially DMSO and THF, do not contain hydrogen to form hydrogen bonds with Cs biocomposites. This means that the ions in the solvent are freely moving, which makes the solvent highly reactive . However, OPF and COM nanocellulose were able to protect the Cs biocomposites from a high mass loss despite placing them in highly reactivity solvents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cellulose nanofibers were produced by hydrolyzing OPEFB with sulfuric acid Fahma et al [39] Microfibrillated celluloses from OPEFB Goh et al [100] Production defatted OPS nanoparticles Dungani et al [101] and Rosamah et al [102] Nanofibrillated from EFB using ultrasound assisted hydrolysis Rosazley et al [103] EFB nanocrystalline cellulose was isolated from OPEFB microcrystalline cellulose Rohaizu and Wanrosli [104] Nanocellulose from OPF using alkaline processes Mohaiyiddin et al [105] Production cellulose nanocrystals from OPF by hydrolysis treatment Saurabh et al [106] Isolation of cellulose nanowhiskers from oil palm mesocarp fibers by acid hydrolysis and microfluidization Adriana et al [107] Production cellulose nanocrystals from OPF by chemo-mechanical treatment Nordin et al [38] Oil palm mesocarp fiber as a source for the production of cellulose nanocrystals Chieng et al [108] Nanofillers obtained from OPA Abdul Khalil et al [7] The utilization of OPA as a nanofiller for the development of polymer nanocomposites Bhat and Abdul Khalil [109] Nanocellulose was extracted from OPT fibers by a chemi-mechanical technique Surip et al [110] Cellulose nanocrystals were isolated from OPT using acid hydrolysis method and total chlorine free method Lamaming et al [111] Table 7. Events in the exploration of isolation nanocellulose from oil palm biomass with various methods and their related applications.…”
Section: Event Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%