1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4005(97)80200-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of microelectrode arrays by means of electrochemical and surface analysis methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wittkampf et al [26] presented surface analyses of UMEAs by TOF-MS, SIMS, SEM, and STM and demonstrated the utility of these techniques in assessing the quality of UMEAs. With the TOF-SIM, they found trace silver from the on-chip Ag=AgCl reference and aluminum due to inadequate removal of the adhesion layer.…”
Section: Surface Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wittkampf et al [26] presented surface analyses of UMEAs by TOF-MS, SIMS, SEM, and STM and demonstrated the utility of these techniques in assessing the quality of UMEAs. With the TOF-SIM, they found trace silver from the on-chip Ag=AgCl reference and aluminum due to inadequate removal of the adhesion layer.…”
Section: Surface Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective surface area in comparison to geometric area was expected to be larger due to surface features seen under high magni®cation. The increased surface area was attributed to the roughness caused by the nanocrystallites, the large grain sizes and boundaries, and the cavity between the platinum microelectrode and the insulating layers [26]. Although this may seem to be an extreme case, it clearly demonstrates the necessity of using sensitive surface techniques to ®nd imperfections which can cause irreproducibility in the electrochemical behavior of the array.…”
Section: Surface Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the use of microelectrodes shows a lot of advantageous properties, the very low currents recorded can be problematic and emphasize the need of a very sensitive equipment and a correct electrical isolation of the experimental device [5][6][7]. In the last decade, microelectrode arrays have been consequently developed in order to obtain higher current output compared to a single microelectrode [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most suitable techniques for characterization and evaluation of microsensor arrays are surface analysis techniques. 115,116 For microelectrode arrays based on a combination of screen printing and laser ablation, scanning electrochemical microscopy provides a straightforward test demonstrated that all array elements participate in the heterogeneous redox reaction.…”
Section: G Microelectrode Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%