2003
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of methanogenic and methanotrophic assemblages in landfill samples

Abstract: A greater understanding of the tightly linked trophic groups of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria residing in municipal solid waste landfills will increase our ability to control methane emissions and pollutant fate in these environments. To this end, we characterized the composition of methanogenic and methanotrophic bacteria in samples taken from two regions of a municipal solid waste landfill that varied in age. A method combining polymerase chain reaction amplification, restriction fragment length polymorphis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methanotroph diversity in the landfill soil On the basis of pmoA clone libraries and particularly on pmoA microarray results, a high diversity of pmoA sequences related to both types I and II methanotrophs has been retrieved as reported for other landfill biocover soils (Wise et al, 1999;Bodrossy et al, 2003;Uz et al, 2003;Crossman et al, 2004;Stralis-Pavese et al, 2004). In the Ufton landfill biocover soil, types I and II methanotrophs seemed to be highly diverse with several genera being detected, in particular, after pmoA microarray analysis.…”
Section: Ecology Of Methanotrophs In a Landfill Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methanotroph diversity in the landfill soil On the basis of pmoA clone libraries and particularly on pmoA microarray results, a high diversity of pmoA sequences related to both types I and II methanotrophs has been retrieved as reported for other landfill biocover soils (Wise et al, 1999;Bodrossy et al, 2003;Uz et al, 2003;Crossman et al, 2004;Stralis-Pavese et al, 2004). In the Ufton landfill biocover soil, types I and II methanotrophs seemed to be highly diverse with several genera being detected, in particular, after pmoA microarray analysis.…”
Section: Ecology Of Methanotrophs In a Landfill Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methanotrophs are currently classified as type I methanotrophs (comprising nine genera among the g-proteobacteria) and type II methanotrophs (comprising four genera among the a-proteobacteria), according to their intracytoplasmic membrane structure, carbon assimilation pathways, fatty acid composition and phylogeny (Hanson and Hanson, 1996). Types I and II methanotrophs cohabit landfill soils (Wise et al, 1999;Bodrossy et al, 2003;Uz et al, 2003;Crossman et al, 2004;Stralis-Pavese et al, 2004). All methanotrophs possess methane monooxygenase (MMO) that catalyses the first step of methane oxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeal 16S rRNA genes were amplified with the universal primer 1492R and Archaea-specific primer 23F (5Ј-TGCAGAYCTGGTYGATYCTGCC-3Ј) (3). PCR amplification was performed in a GeneAmp PCR system 2400 (PerkinElmer Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, Conn.) with HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.) as reported earlier (25).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. coli DNA was not detected in the [ 13 C]DNA fractions but was detected in all [ 12 C]DNA fractions (data not shown). Clone libraries were constructed from dense DNA bands and grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) by restriction fragment length polymorphism classification, as described in previous reports (7,8,34). Two or three representatives of each OTU were sequenced and subjected to chimera evaluation (10); two putative chimeric sequences were eliminated from further analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%