2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of MEA degradation for an open air cathode PEM fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research [27] indicates that the CCL experiences a significant thinning upon being exposed to degradation protocols. It appears however, that few studies exist that investigate the dependence of the stability of PEM-cathodes on initial CCL thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research [27] indicates that the CCL experiences a significant thinning upon being exposed to degradation protocols. It appears however, that few studies exist that investigate the dependence of the stability of PEM-cathodes on initial CCL thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4e) and CCM-3 ( Fig. 4f) because of large amount of gas generation in the catalyst layers during water electrolysis and nonuniformity of compression force between the land and under the channel [14]. However, there were no gaps in the cocrystallized CCM-1 before (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Compared with the gas diffusion electrode, the CCM has been demonstrated to have lower catalyst loading, thinner and much more hydrophilic catalyst layers [11]. However, the catalyst layers of the CCM are prone to peel off from the membrane for the following reasons: (1) the different swelling degrees between membrane and catalyst layers in water, (2) large amount of gas generation in catalyst layers during water electrolysis, and (3) nonuniformity of compression force between the land and under the channel [14,15]. In addition, the complete hydrophilicity of catalyst layers of CCM makes against the gas transmission, thus decreases the utilization ratio of the catalysts [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the main technique used to determine the GDL structure was scanning electron microscopy (SEM), frequently coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. SEM is useful in obtaining surface structural data, layer thickness, 'smoothness' of different interfaces, PTFE bonding, and fibre orientation, but fails to reveal the porosity and internal structure [5,6,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Micro and nano X-ray computed tomography (CT) are non-destructive methods that can achieve sufficiently high resolution for the imaging of carbon fibres, which typically have diameters between 5 and 10 m, and they have been increasingly used to characterise GDLs [7,19,[23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Gas Diffusion Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%