1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb03054.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of low‐light‐level cameras for digitized video microscopy

Abstract: SUMMARY The use of low‐light‐level video cameras and solid‐state image detectors in conjunction with image digitizers for optical microscopy is increasing dramatically as more people learn about such systems, and as they become more powerful, less expensive, and easier to use. However, there is currently little information available allowing comparison between cameras, or for determining camera suitability for a given experiment. In this paper, we describe a series of tests designed to characterize the perform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although use of a color camera reduced the detection efficiency, this could be compensated for by accumulating (integrating) the signal for greater periods of time on the faceplate of the camera. This also proved more precise than using a high gain intensifier tube (31). The output from the camera (red, green, and blue analog signals), was first converted to hue, saturation, and intensity (H, S, and I) and then by use of a n analog-to-digital convertor (A in Fig.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Automatic Fluorescence Image Cytometermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although use of a color camera reduced the detection efficiency, this could be compensated for by accumulating (integrating) the signal for greater periods of time on the faceplate of the camera. This also proved more precise than using a high gain intensifier tube (31). The output from the camera (red, green, and blue analog signals), was first converted to hue, saturation, and intensity (H, S, and I) and then by use of a n analog-to-digital convertor (A in Fig.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Automatic Fluorescence Image Cytometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification is accurate because the intensity of the emitted fluorescence is directly proportional to the stain concentration in the specimen and because automatic image analysis is highly consistent in defining the boundaries of nuclei (16). Furthermore, automatic image analysis requires minimal manual effort and low levels of labeled markers can be detected using a low-light camera (31), making fluorescent stains at least as sensitive as lightabsorbing (colorimetric) stains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using interlace defeat circuitry, 16 msec temporal resolution might be possible. However, the half signal detector lag time of the ISIT camera employed was only slightly less than 33 msec (Tsay et al, 1989). This limitation might be overcome by using an intensified video-rate CCD camera, now commercially available, which has a much shorter detector lag.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent camera designs involve more sophisticated, "second or third generation" image intensifiers optically coupled to conventional video cameras or, better, to high-quality video-rate CCD cameras (Spring and Lowy 1989;Tsay et al 1990). While such optical coupling can be achieved using lenses, light transfer is more efficient using a bundle of optical fibres.…”
Section: Cameras For Low-light-level Fluorescence Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%