2003
DOI: 10.21236/ada412137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Low Density Glass Filled Epoxies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the glass MS/CE composites, the tensile modulus increased from 2.7 GPa for the neat CE to 5.2 GPa for the 40 wt% (24.5 vol%) glass MS/CE composite. Quesenberry et al reported an increase in tensile modulus from ∼ 2.8 GPa (neat epoxy) to ∼4.5 GPa for 25 vol% solid glass spheres/epoxy composite. Similarly, Lee et al reported an increased modulus from about 2.8 GPa for the neat epoxy, to ∼4.9 GPa for 20 vol% glass MS. Our tensile modulus results reported here are similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the glass MS/CE composites, the tensile modulus increased from 2.7 GPa for the neat CE to 5.2 GPa for the 40 wt% (24.5 vol%) glass MS/CE composite. Quesenberry et al reported an increase in tensile modulus from ∼ 2.8 GPa (neat epoxy) to ∼4.5 GPa for 25 vol% solid glass spheres/epoxy composite. Similarly, Lee et al reported an increased modulus from about 2.8 GPa for the neat epoxy, to ∼4.9 GPa for 20 vol% glass MS. Our tensile modulus results reported here are similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These materials can take a variety of forms (5,6). They can be filled or unfilled thermosetting epoxy resins.…”
Section: Encapsulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have experimentally determined the mechancial properties of filled polymeric composites [10 -13]. Matthew Quesenberry et al [14], have experimentally studied the characteristics of low density glass filled epoxies on density, co-efficient of thermal expansion and composite modulus. A comparative experimental study has been made between solid glass filler, hollow glass filler and combination of both solid and hollow filler for various volume fractions.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%