2020
DOI: 10.1587/transinf.2019iip0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Interestingness Measures Using Correlation Analysis and Association Rule Mining

Abstract: Objective interestingness measures play a vital role in association rule mining of a large-scaled database because they are used for extracting, filtering, and ranking the patterns. In the past, several measures have been proposed but their similarities or relations are not sufficiently explored. This work investigates sixty-one objective interestingness measures on the pattern of A → B, to analyze their similarity and dissimilarity as well as their relationship. Three-probability patterns, P(A), P(B), and P(A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method's efficiency is limited in practice because it usually prunes only a few redundant rules (Raeder & Chawla, 2011). Another solution is to filter the interesting rules from the candidate association rules based on either objective or subjective interestingness measures (Gan et al, 2018;Sethi & Shekar, 2019;Somyanonthanakul & Theeramunkong, 2020). However, such measures rank association rules ambiguously and differently, and many of them are considered a "deviation from independence"; that is, an association rule may be ranked high by one interestingness measure but ranked low by another (Raeder & Chawla, 2011).…”
Section: Ac Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method's efficiency is limited in practice because it usually prunes only a few redundant rules (Raeder & Chawla, 2011). Another solution is to filter the interesting rules from the candidate association rules based on either objective or subjective interestingness measures (Gan et al, 2018;Sethi & Shekar, 2019;Somyanonthanakul & Theeramunkong, 2020). However, such measures rank association rules ambiguously and differently, and many of them are considered a "deviation from independence"; that is, an association rule may be ranked high by one interestingness measure but ranked low by another (Raeder & Chawla, 2011).…”
Section: Ac Bmentioning
confidence: 99%