2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-376764/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Interannual and Seasonal Variability of Hydro-Climatic Trends in the Upper Indus Basin

Abstract: A high resolution seasonal and annual precipitation climatology of the Upper Indus Basin was developed, based on 1995-2017 precipitation normals obtained from four different gridded datasets (Aphrodite, CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CDR and ERA5) and quality-controlled high and mid elevation ground observations. Monthly precipitation values were estimated through the anomaly method at the catchment scale and compared with runoff data (1975-2017) for verification and detection of changes in the hydrological cycle. The gridd… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data are developed by using an advanced 4D-Var assimilation scheme and provide various atmospheric variables at 139 pressure levels for the period 1979-present. The suitability of ERA5 to the UJB and surrounding region was also reported by Liaqat et al (2021) and Baudouin et 2020). The DM method adjusts the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of modelled precipitation to match with the observed precipitation CDF using a transfer function (Sennikovs and Bethers, 2009), and it is commonly used to correct the systematic distributional biases (Cannon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Data Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The data are developed by using an advanced 4D-Var assimilation scheme and provide various atmospheric variables at 139 pressure levels for the period 1979-present. The suitability of ERA5 to the UJB and surrounding region was also reported by Liaqat et al (2021) and Baudouin et 2020). The DM method adjusts the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of modelled precipitation to match with the observed precipitation CDF using a transfer function (Sennikovs and Bethers, 2009), and it is commonly used to correct the systematic distributional biases (Cannon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Data Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The use of W5E5 (WFDE5 data over land and ERA5 over ocean) for the present study is motivated by the 40 numerous previous studies. For instance, the suitability of ERA5 and its slightly overestimation of precipitation over the study region (UJB), especially over the mountainous part of the basin, have been evaluated and acknowledged by several researchers (Ansari et al, 2022;(Baudouin et al, 2020;Arshad et al, 2021;Liaqat et al, 2022). These studies recommend performing the bias correction of ERA5 with localized data before its application in impact studies.…”
Section: Reference Dataset 25mentioning
confidence: 99%