2007
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m704361200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Interactions of Adapter Protein RAPL/Nore1B with RAP GTPases and Their Role in T Cell Migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulates lymphocyte adhesion, T cell migration, T cell receptor regulation [84,86,186] Controls the directional migration of vascular endothelial cells [6] arising from alternative splicing and differential promoter usage. Among the RASSF1 subtypes, 1A and 1C are the most extensively studied members with both localized to microtubules and involved in regulation of growth and migration [14,15].…”
Section: Kdamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulates lymphocyte adhesion, T cell migration, T cell receptor regulation [84,86,186] Controls the directional migration of vascular endothelial cells [6] arising from alternative splicing and differential promoter usage. Among the RASSF1 subtypes, 1A and 1C are the most extensively studied members with both localized to microtubules and involved in regulation of growth and migration [14,15].…”
Section: Kdamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these proteins have been identified by their ability to bind to Rap-GTP via RA domains (Frische and Zwartkruis, 2010). However, with the exception of Riam and RapL, which can regulate integrin complexes (Ebisuno et al, 2010;Katagiri et al, 2006;Katagiri et al, 2003;Kinashi and Katagiri, 2004;Lafuente and Boussiotis, 2006;Lafuente et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2009;Miertzschke et al, 2007;Watanabe et al, 2008), it is unclear how most of these different proteins bring about Rap-induced changes. Furthermore, it is not yet understood how the functions of these individual proteins relate to one another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the outcome of Rap activation on cell adhesion and actin remodelling is well established, the mechanisms by which these occur are less well understood, but are beginning to be elucidated. A number of proteins, including Riam (Lafuente and Boussiotis, 2006;Lafuente et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2009;Watanabe et al, 2008), RapL (Ebisuno et al, 2010;Katagiri et al, 2006;Katagiri et al, 2003;Kinashi and Katagiri, 2004;Miertzschke et al, 2007), Arap3 (Krugmann et al, 2004;Raaijmakers et al, 2007), Tiam1 (Arthur et al, 2004), AF6 (Boettner et al, 2000;Zhang et al, 2005), and Radil (Ahmed et al, 2010;Smolen et al, 2007) have been proposed to be Rap effector proteins that mediate aspects of Rap-induced changes to integrins or the cytoskeleton (Bos, 2005;Raaijmakers and Bos, 2009). Most of these proteins have been identified by their ability to bind to Rap-GTP via RA domains (Frische and Zwartkruis, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we did not investigate the role of the Rap2 GTPase as a potential mediator of a L b 2 activation and TEM in Rap1-unresponsive a 4 b 1 + CLL cells. To do so seemed important because Rap2 is involved in the migration of normal lymphocytes (27), is activated by chemokine stimulation, and has functions that overlap with those of Rap1 (28,29). Examination of 16 CLL samples showed that Rap2 levels were much lower than levels of Rap1 (4.5 6 0.7 versus 172 6 17 ng/5 3 10 6 cells) (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Rap2 Is Expressed At Low Levels and Is Not Gtp Loaded In Cllmentioning
confidence: 99%